Re: [kitten] WGLC for three "bis" documents: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc4402bis-00, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-01, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-00

Weijun Wang <weijun.wang@oracle.com> Tue, 03 February 2015 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <weijun.wang@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B9B1A1A68 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:52:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B1dEUMROrBHF for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F255C1A1A4C for <kitten@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t131q2mS006866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 01:52:03 GMT
Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t131q1gB013446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 01:52:02 GMT
Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t131q0tp008058; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 01:52:01 GMT
Received: from [192.168.10.107] (/123.122.155.79) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:52:00 -0800
Message-ID: <54D029B3.3050003@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 09:51:47 +0800
From: Weijun Wang <weijun.wang@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1501201753140.23489@multics.mit.edu> <54CE9F5B.9070808@mit.edu> <54CEE8E5.5080701@oracle.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502021122260.23489@multics.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502021122260.23489@multics.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/kVlWuCBY2EgoDOze8k8u7rrAn4Q>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] WGLC for three "bis" documents: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc4402bis-00, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-01, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-00
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:52:05 -0000

But the xml2rfc tool claims

    No boilerplate text available for ipr: 'full2026'.  Acceptable 
values are: trust200902, noModificationTrust200902, 
noDerivativesTrust200902, pre5378Trust200902, trust200811, 
noModificationTrust200811, noDerivativesTrust200811

I decide to choose "pre5378Trust200902". The output text is almost 
identical to that of RFC 5653, but adding these lines which I think is 
harmless

        Code Components extracted from this document must
    include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
    the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
    described in the Simplified BSD License.

Thanks
Max

On 2/3/2015 0:28, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> I believe this is the 'ipr' attribute of the <rfc> tag at the beginning of
> the document, perhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2629#section-2.2.7.1  --
> unfortunately, that RFC does not document all the possible values listed
> in the DTD, and the DTD itself
> (http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/algorithms-rfc/rfc2629.dtd  ?)
> doesn't offer much guidance about what each value does.