Re: [kitten] Call for adoption on draft-whited-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13

[Simo Sorce <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 12:57 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> On behalf of Sam Whited, I'm issuing a call for adoption of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-whited-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13/
> 
> We've discussed this with the TLS working group, and consensus is that
> this work should take place in kitten (with consultation from TLS
> folks).
> 
> Besides Sam, I've seen interest expressed by Alexey,  Anyone else
> interested in this, or have objections?

Over time I've heard comments that the current tls-unique bindings are
not working out as initially expected. It would be nice to know if we
also plan to address those issues in this draft (or whether this draft
already avoid those).

Note that in practice, in the wild, I see that most implementations I
am exposed to are opting for tls-server-end-point, so it would be
important to know that this new bindings of type unique for TLS 1.3
will be usable and there are consumers wanting to use them.

Not pushing back just asking to address these questions in due course.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc