Re: [kitten] RFC2743 errata 4251

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451131A87D4 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.044
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.044 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3z2Gg-oH4PWT for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F2A1A8839 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA51E222 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=owwP2toQe/5SGpAAEsUk jvAxDNQ=; b=jUmujQpozyY7CCQDoDkdJk2pbQOm/CgiT21X0zASI2aUhHKma6wc RpYg/cR/1XzFR0SmVsTy0J5WzejK8+cY/JkWqWrCmMIaQsMRpW2nP1BOvs/R1fgD a4kF1es6gmLlVB9kSQRfMlJQCQi3EEo81ZvzEZKAi68MKdMHb8NRtpg=
Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (mail-ig0-f176.google.com [209.85.213.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 750B8163B for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hl2so37275968igb.3 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.171.170 with SMTP id av10mr28524475igc.28.1424884512470; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.130.66 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502251131520.3953@multics.mit.edu>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1411241330400.19231@multics.mit.edu> <20141124185114.GM3200@localhost> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1412091618550.23489@multics.mit.edu> <20141209215519.GI12979@localhost> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1412091856160.23489@multics.mit.edu> <20141210002441.GP12979@localhost> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1412101349030.23489@multics.mit.edu> <548F185E.70701@mit.edu> <5492032F.9050607@mit.edu> <20141217230505.GD9443@localhost> <20141220001633.GD12662@localhost> <1421269970.18482.184.camel@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1501201620290.23489@multics.mit.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1501201908540.23489@multics.mit.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502251131520.3953@multics.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:15:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOguCw2NLU9uguo8FVHBVaMTE8_R_Pm7CJYE4ME01-1yPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/n4YmIGZNB0800VcMpLrO0YSCMBM>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] RFC2743 errata 4251
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:15:19 -0000

I believe this text is correct.

As to Ben's question, I don't think text to the effect of when the
application should get around to calling GSS_Delete_sec_context() is
needed.  Application developers will end up figuring that out for
themselves.

Nico
--