Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 (4337)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 22 April 2015 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E9F1AD066 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, IXHASH_X1=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OtvqJqByzHT for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9771AD072 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88234674060 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=4ekCX0h7gvrMRsLxU4FP E+LMh6A=; b=wq4Vy7p2C2n+Qacwbs6vBoYNUIDhRe274V52LZPRd2JtkU7sjMnS +nyukaL8IFkefdydjmCWe5xaZr83pjZY+kvWTxNZo0YTYJNBeRu5jCrkoollc1UM MDkDA2X/8o0J0apBpd8a32rwfFpdUlhig9Cr36+E5s1q+FrI5m+m6Rg=
Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 599E1674058 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so49363519ied.1 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.7.87 with SMTP id 84mr38272466ioh.76.1429726763072; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.128.133 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tsl1tjct56n.fsf@mit.edu>
References: <20150418215222.7ABFD180206@rfc-editor.org> <4268E41F-712E-425D-B514-C0023D311462@gmail.com> <tsl7ft7zx9f.fsf@mit.edu> <20150419230843.GP13041@localhost> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1504201355350.22210@multics.mit.edu> <tslr3rewu53.fsf@mit.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1504221346180.22210@multics.mit.edu> <tsl1tjct56n.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:19:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOgfotvHpJG2byyZVW=wpkg0gmqKWYsrJtt2dyEZS=pjuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/o8Ml-E8hcmvFelUd5dC3DR7gDrI>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, "leifj@sunet.se" <leifj@sunet.se>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 (4337)
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:19:32 -0000

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:
> I'm fine with the new comment, but I'd recommend marking approved.
> We can still do the update

+1