Re: [kitten] RFC2743 errata 4251

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 24 November 2014 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1283D1A701E for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.044
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.044 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cx-MmQGUu5ZH for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3FC1A8783 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D7F1DE059 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=hMXUH152qoJgOS9+ajVd GY7Jx1A=; b=m8aZut4CVKjF3HXbqZLT+Jp1nYmI1CCbtl685/SWm3hw7p7N2bm3 wF+bPW6TEddrFTFdiABerw0kwrG6DWryGP2VyPMFAdRc34saFgWEeHMA+JCqhAlN iF64HrfzL9I6qMD3NtexXm2IwVwuks2CdW1NNb/laHnlnNvZpVXejf8=
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A00E1DE058 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ex7so6680914wid.3 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.104.234 with SMTP id gh10mr23803012wib.3.1416854029065; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.32.136 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:33:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1411241330400.19231@multics.mit.edu>
References: <20141104204714.GI7913@localhost> <20141108014820.3278A1AFAB@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <20141110162504.GA3412@localhost> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1411241330400.19231@multics.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:33:49 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOio+=Ht-o0QX0NfLmzer+BCJEPDPug2=ceHXXqzibL4OA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/p1KwXNpOkmbC2T135vtJjLDNwIA
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] RFC2743 errata 4251
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:33:56 -0000

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Nico Williams wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 02:48:20AM +0100, Martin Rex wrote:
>> >
>> > You find similar descriptions for GSS_S_FAILURE semantics all over
>> > the GSS-API specification _on_purpose_, and you _may_not_ remove that
>> > meaning here.
>>
>> Fair enough, we'll add text rather than replace text.
>
> Nico, do you plan to come up with text for an alternate proposal?

Yes, I do (I was hoping Martin might :).

> Stephen can make the changes once we have text we're happy with.

OK.