IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Requesting WG adoption of several SCRAM related documents

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Wed, 03 November 2021 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AE33A0CD8 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4x2ZT_1nAVgN for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CE853A08B9 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635961418; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OWWhhEaQCafZEhLK3HpFUCpDFzXTuXAHDCq/i2zdsaw=; b=UZ3f+V6HFVG/46tKwqJyAqvmVKFW7n2b9J6wConsoKkmPORKNTJd5auuW2L1eajp0yuK8R SJ1bzL2qCVud15tkuuxOd0rBqW+/To79OIaPFn0tXDF8gaujCDuJqhaB7bx72MtaL7N6A/ 2DCmcuh64NzVSuXibqWgEn8vq2wl/Os=
Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-420-K1YFkejOMFqGgsLI9_CwsQ-1; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:43:37 -0400
X-MC-Unique: K1YFkejOMFqGgsLI9_CwsQ-1
Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id o15-20020a0cc38f000000b0038455e36f89so3422367qvi.6 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=OWWhhEaQCafZEhLK3HpFUCpDFzXTuXAHDCq/i2zdsaw=; b=foD7wmlZFHnW/7+4mhtIayYy2NZvE7A4nxfJGZMiZPrAQzufDVmyGnBdNxmFFsTBbS Tn7Pviq4KO+zfOJxWS7q8FqyVBNY0T4xFfVJeiG8J8oVyu3TWm4/KNQMra7SjR1Z6RLa m+kVU9RRHqHrVhCZS/iKIvNAn+005jRGujM/y2jXt4FGAri2y7PPCuJ0EQCW2WqCVl7+ ar9dv8le6dbiL/u42w+lRRyHrrE4rGPEWFoh6AKjIjsJGQJATeFnZ2hRryH6TSP20Lmd 3WaxEppX7o42lIMNO5mxGPOxOgraDPBNjxmHpOP4EUpAhk3+JZoga+qEgDMRrsr67xp2 LYCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ZlUgdD7IhIYUqYBrfDpHnq84nurJGANwwxdOrvv1Z7Kzu8V72 vZznABLn6X61sMogiKAx7oAXaZOXcJNAu3gbr7Ek5fWQnPGy1XK9yuRfpRIKSqjxSSze9ylSyNv A4Qbmk3M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1208:: with SMTP id y8mr38276476qtx.214.1635961416567; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwF1lln2pVa9QRnHG1wdT41eEaIe3opfSkcAKTRDhGJgHFUeg1I2Ku1QBqj4fCfgvYuRjfrCA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1208:: with SMTP id y8mr38276445qtx.214.1635961416303; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2601:184:4181:74c0:862e:5809:ed9e:e10e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u18sm2054148qki.69.2021.11.03.10.43.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <87ilxjo6e1.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <4a14c16b-644f-ac40-7b3a-a1712c9aa3d2@isode.com> <87ilxjo6e1.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:43:34 -0400
Message-ID: <jlgpmrhi189.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=rharwood@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/sB8ysPwGuqDOuUzoyKca4n_HhcU>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Requesting WG adoption of several SCRAM related documents
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 17:43:45 -0000

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> writes:

> Hi.  I'm not strongly opposed to these work items, but I do feel
> publishing these documents without adressing high-level concerns have
> a risk of causing problems during deployment.  I think the WG should
> understand and consider the implication before adopting the documents
> - maybe there is alternative work that needs to happen before/instead.

Hi Simon, do you have any further thoughts on this in light of Ruslan's
and Alexey's comments in reply?

Be well,
--Robbie

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email