IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Kerberos preauth negotiation techniques

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 17 February 2015 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F309D1A88BA for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:30:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KE5QucLFZQ_c for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:30:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C3C1A8832 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:30:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F6C2004EE08; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:30:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=p/UfDyLb2j8Ve/ mybExhFUYYvGE=; b=KOAS3sQ1IUitAwLGKi7UybffYohZ4CuwI3CJaWl0ll3X2b 6Y0iMT0a9yy8INzqIFV77yXZLyq0XC/4Z6t9UzueDh2wUoBZ6XgandZ2vMgakwG0 K6UFWczkem3kbdG4+T6dJ6ms72rqQW9ZCF8eu7xtj1DGvsePe+uFIXCLQ+o1w=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3AC652005D82D; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:30:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:30:17 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150217173017.GH5246@localhost>
References: <x7da90k47ox.fsf@equal-rites.mit.edu> <1423681272.5770.5.camel@willson.usersys.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1423681272.5770.5.camel@willson.usersys.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/tbLCj5RGSv1BglidWIU2xB1QMlE>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Kerberos preauth negotiation techniques
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:30:20 -0000

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:01:12PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I strongly prefer 3.
> Clients can easily limit the amount of data they will send so I am not
> concerned that the AS_REQ will grow too much.

Ah, because they can always try multiple times, but with (1) each
additional attempt costs an additional round-trip, thus making any
trade-off of request size to round trip count seem much less worthwhile.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email