IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: MOGGIES Proposed Charter<

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 26 May 2010 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30953A6B2F; Tue, 25 May 2010 17:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hmo09Aw0LFfN; Tue, 25 May 2010 17:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44AC3A6C64; Tue, 25 May 2010 16:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06D5120239; Tue, 25 May 2010 19:08:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 30B9743EF; Tue, 25 May 2010 19:07:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: mrex@sap.com
Subject: Re: MOGGIES Proposed Charter<
References: <201005212011.o4LKBBFk012803@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 19:07:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201005212011.o4LKBBFk012803@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> (Martin Rex's message of "Fri, 21 May 2010 22:11:11 +0200 (MEST)")
Message-ID: <tslfx1f60n7.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: kitten@ietf.org, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, jhutz@cmu.edu, sasl@ietf.org, tim.polk@nist.gov
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 00:40:20 -0000

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> writes:


I join Martin.  I think that closing sasl and rechartering is disruptive
enough.  I don't think it makes sense to change the name of two WGs.  I
definitely don't think that it makes sense to change to a new mailing
list instead of one of the existing mailing lists.  I don't think the
new name or a desire to have a new name is sufficiently compelling to
change the mailing list.

so:

1) I strongly object to the new wg using a mailing list other than
kitten@ietf.org the old SASL list.
2) I don't think it wise for the new WG to have a name that disagrees
with its mailing list.

As a result I fairly strongly believe the WG should be called kitten or
SASL.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email