Approved brain booster -- NYT

Approved Memory-Booster <Robert@watersneurocenter.com> Wed, 01 April 2015 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <RobertWalker@smail-cal.watersneurocenter.com>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F093E1A1A76 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.089
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_95=3, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_24=0.6, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id moYthQJXWOrh for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail-cal.watersneurocenter.com (smail-cal.watersneurocenter.com [85.239.149.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DA31B29E9 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:02:31 -0700
From: Approved Memory-Booster <Robert@watersneurocenter.com>
Reply-to: <Robert@watersneurocenter.com>
Subject: Approved brain booster -- NYT
Message-ID: <64418232449387AcsmzY.20150331180903113@smail-cal.watersneurocenter.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6938231878774255918=="
MIME-Version: 1.0

Re: Krb-wg-archive Make sure the interviewer has no reservations about you. Demonstrate your interest in the employer. Find out if you feel the employer is the right fit for you.


(Update NYT) - Controversy looms over FDA approved brain booster shown to increase memory function by 89%. With much media attention it's debatable whether this should continue to be available for consumers.

http://www.watersneurocenter.com/embellisher_43005_tranship.htm

Is it unfair?


<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-


New | Comment | Top | NYT Reporting Live | 102 Linwood Ct Natchez MS (Exit message at t h i s ---- http://www.watersneurocenter.com/6315_356/crucifix.html location for ease)


EDIT 2:

Here is the difference in the assembly code. On the left is the fast code with the line
cb_last_orbital_update = time;

outcommented, on the right the slow code with the line.

EDIT 4:
<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-
So, i found a workaround that seems to work just fine so far:
int cb_orbit_update_counter = 1; // before while loop  if(time - cb_orbit_update_counter * 5E6 > 0) {     cb_orbit_update_counter++; }

EDIT 5: