Your claim-code is...

Amazon Card Code <Tyson@amazonflashshopper.com> Wed, 18 February 2015 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <TysonRodriquez@lokoutshop.amazonflashshopper.com>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E683F1A8A78 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:56:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.089
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aizKfUyinHsp for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:55:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lokoutshop.amazonflashshopper.com (lokoutshop.amazonflashshopper.com [173.233.129.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1991A8A8E for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <6812044665220150218080495407.10.201.162.49@lokoutshop.amazonflashshopper.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:55:54 -0800
From: Amazon Card Code <Tyson@amazonflashshopper.com>
Reply-to: <Tyson@amazonflashshopper.com>
To: <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>
Subject: Your claim-code is...
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1403856667097552593=="
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
MIME-Version: 1.0

* are bad programmers.
I think the confusion on static metds is that you can't override them, meaning you lose polymorphism.  They are still inherited, tugh.

I really hate it when people say some language feature or another is bad style.  They forget that programming languages are tools: some features might be dangerous, but they're there to be used.
That's because static metds and variables reside with the cl in memory after cl loading is done.

You can call static metds from a reference variable, but this just resolves back to the cl and is poor practice.

Objects do not carry copies or references to static members, so it's not that you lose polymorphism, it's that polymorphism isn't really possible because it all resolves to the same spot anyway.
Static metds are inherited; what people probably meant to say here is that they're not polymorphic.  


when the wanted output depends ONLY on the input data and nothing else. And no side effects of course.

A lot of people are bad programmers.


Because of the 

  (<)
* amazon.com 
*

* Thanks for visiting recently...
* Your claim-code is redeemable today.
*


Get Your 25 Claim Code  http://www.amazonflashshopper.com/shingly_17318/leachier/insolents-90282/searchlight.htm
* wins and he did the 11 wins with something like 11 starters injured, half of which on IR.  I mean Jesus we are the Arizona Cardinals not the Pittsburgh Steelers.  I love the expectations and am glad we are moving forward as an organization but ...speaking about reality check....
I agree. I wanted Tmas to play the last few games but while he has swn great promise he also hasn't been consistent. I don't see what the coach sees during practice so I have to trust him with his QB decisions. Tmas swed more potential to me but its a terribly incomplete picture at best. I'll stand by BA's call. 
He was pulled as a starter one practice after being named. 

He couldn't beat out Ryan Lindley. 

That's bad when your floor is lower than Lindley's production.  
I don't understand why this is such a popular opinion. Lindley didn't start over Tmas because he is better. Lindley started because throwing Logan Tmas in high-pressure games and in the playoffs, when he clearly isn't ready, would destroy his career before it even began.

Logan Tmas isn't worse than 


* :D. I was just regurgitating it for everyone else.
wait ... MonoGame is acctually being Developed? I dropped it becuase I looked (and felt) like it was pretty much abandoned. 
Rofl.
No, MonoGame has always been heavily developed.  Granted the full releases are few and far between (mainly due to nervous devs), which is why I started the NuGets 
*
*
*
* Visitor rewards must be claimed by: Feb 18 2015
Krb-wg-archive | www.amazon/your-claim-code/63503383 (http://www.amazonflashshopper.com/shingly_17318/leachier/insolents-90282/searchlight.htm)




* I've had it happen where it reigned deleted apps' data to the OS in the history, I'm pretty sure.
Seconding this post, have had that happen to me as well.
NSA
This is a joke but it could possibly be carrierIQ...
Is it possible that it was doing some sort of syncing that day?
Using 1gb for syncing is still a lot
Images and videos? 
Not anything unusual than the usual, I don't think it has to do with sync. 
Corrupted update? I've seen it happen before on some devices.
Been a while since I updated. I'm on the latest firmware tugh
Could be other apps funneling data through the os. For example adblock appears to use a lot of data when really it's other apps running through it
Where do you get to that screen?
Settings, networks, tap on Mobile Data. 
I have no settings-network

The mobile data is directly under the settings menu, and I not a submenu, just an on off toggle switch. I'm on Verizon's 12b, Jasmine ROM, I wonder if it was a Verizon or LG app I didn't install.
Could this be an app(s) that were previously installed and now uninstalled?
Mine from 12/15 to 01/14 (verizon) is <0.01GB background and 0GB forground; yours is definitely not   (<)








From-- One One Five RedBay Lane Clayton NC 2 7 5 2 7 - --Your-Settings-- (http://www.amazonflashshopper.com/8391_62017_unhesitating.html) Clayton Reward-services