[L1vpn] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5252 (3310)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 07 August 2012 11:25 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: l1vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l1vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63C721F8622 for <l1vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q89P1KK7iIFZ for <l1vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CB621F850B for <l1vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D2E90B1E002; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: ibryskin@advaoptical.com, lberger@labn.net, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, adrian@olddog.co.uk, hbrahim@nortel.com, takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120807112425.D2E90B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 04:24:25 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:12:23 -0700
Cc: kmichiel@cisco.com, l1vpn@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [L1vpn] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5252 (3310)
X-BeenThere: l1vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks <l1vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l1vpn>, <mailto:l1vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l1vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l1vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l1vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn>, <mailto:l1vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:25:25 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5252, "OSPF-Based Layer 1 VPN Auto-Discovery". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5252&eid=3310 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Kris Michielsen <kmichiel@cisco.com> Section: 2.1 Original Text ------------- L1VPN Info TLV A single TLV, as defined in Section 3.2, MUST be present. If more than one L1VPN Info TLV is present, only the first TLV is processed and the others MUST be ignored on receipt. Corrected Text -------------- L1VPN Info TLV A single TLV, as defined in Section 2.2, MUST be present. If more than one L1VPN Info TLV is present, only the first TLV is processed and the others MUST be ignored on receipt. Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5252 (draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-06) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPF-Based Layer 1 VPN Auto-Discovery Publication Date : July 2008 Author(s) : I. Bryskin, L. Berger Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- Re: [L1vpn] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5252 (… Lou Berger
- [L1vpn] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5252 (3310) RFC Errata System