Re: [L2sm] Alia Atlas' No Objection on charter-ietf-l2sm-00-01: (with COMMENT)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Fri, 14 October 2016 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1978F129855; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TBmXbJEJR6HV; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22c.google.com (mail-yw0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F6A129516; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t193so78115994ywc.2; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ibv/nz7oiVJqF6HYokzmxtXYQDqNv7wb7dNTkBgswxU=; b=qXfeVBG4ifjTZZQmvd0yrPqxbEnPU7pctaI0a5qqhcR422UDrbhpgtnsr9yHzZK/IX jaQxaSQ1N5HhRxwWKc6s8Ttu9sbTYpQLwIdIbYqnU9T2FzyVmvjgP3M6Jen2A6LN7/De Cv+svDqezTK1vjtXFM+5yMZw6ssMvZaGxl1kqOsN3oikeX3y+TvjiX0OTRXm8WVJ8olK 7bCYQkAZVqyTa8OsGlaoWNVQFQdl5O85Iek1SXpRxu+pW+2DDILa4PgBR1TVDPCWkZ+/ td7x+pSebvvvr1G9HNuWoU1+7KAz5C2mWGQCDZZNiLYGA4KViencxhpIweydVZEuRsN6 2zVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ibv/nz7oiVJqF6HYokzmxtXYQDqNv7wb7dNTkBgswxU=; b=fCD2H5B8a5oAplg/YkyYHBbyoWT7GlvZ88ndK5/plVVRD3WStLIaMvOB4YMe/upZyw lPAuv11jAeWYnh0iBpqOJBZQfe2NuqKiszf58BPU/wANH1S/TJdhpKPvw5u0KjmF2uUK BGFBK0QW4qBSSaN+6ghvKvwmMJkt/jYFb36KBC8QIwGdV5QZ61M63gzp9dNkZJCEcG69 A3cmArm5lvOFgfP2nm8QnwVIDc+ZoBtaa0I5kt0dvAYFK8QAzFdi/JAX9uDAsGc5Ho9F dJT/5zqUgN0Ran4JwufDPAZ4mrc4Z9QTtQ8eyNycAkA+HGPlPNpNRT6Z7BhFCBkFyd61 9Hjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnZQSHBUa0Mx24ALu1i8ZXDUX1F8g9TjGIZ3x0dHYCx0wk2liyl2a7VdMVrwX4ALlniOcK5WGbxufx6NQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.50.10 with SMTP id y10mr11030398ywy.136.1476462809107; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.56.133 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <10ffe913-16c3-5675-2378-10154234e3f2@cisco.com>
References: <147636479632.2894.7376748604935262928.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <10ffe913-16c3-5675-2378-10154234e3f2@cisco.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:33:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rc=PLZZ7r4xv5-FER7F2+TOYGsXUm+F-maCgcZqk3xyMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11414f0642e27d053ed5c91f
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/0i68BaxqqGfQlhucrh-Pyokjs7A>
Cc: l2sm-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, l2sm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [L2sm] Alia Atlas' No Objection on charter-ietf-l2sm-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:33:32 -0000

Hi Benoit,

Thank you.  I look forward to a good WG.

Regards,
Alia

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Alia,
>
> Added.
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.
> ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-l2sm%2Fwithmilestones-00-01.
> txt&url2=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-
> ietf-l2sm%2Fwithmilestones-00-03.txt
>
> Sending this charter to external review now.
> From here, we'll take into account all feedback, including for the L2SM
> mailing list (I have seen Michael's feedback, for example).
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
> Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
>> charter-ietf-l2sm-00-01: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-l2sm/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I am surprised not to see EVPN included in the list of technologies,
>> since it is a replacement for VPLS.
>> I understand that the service model should be fairly technology
>> independent, but if it can't handle EVPN,
>> that'll be an issue.   Could you please update it to at least mention
>> EVPN as one of the technologies?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> L2sm mailing list
>> L2sm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm
>> .
>>
>>
>