[L2sm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 02:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF669120725; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, l2sm-chairs@ietf.org, adrian@olddog.co.uk, l2sm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.77.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152280833284.24011.15735079187669210549.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:18:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/1K6_G6QIJa37yLhSOILebOeFNtA>
Subject: [L2sm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 02:18:53 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Just a few editorial comments: Abstract: The abstract seems overly long and detailed. In particular, the 2nd paragraph is not very meaningful without the elaborations later in the body of the document. It should probably be removed from the abstract, or at least reduced to the last two sentences. §1: Paragraph 1 needs elaboration. Paragraph 4 provides that elaboration. I suggest keeping them together rather than separate them with other paragraphs that are only loosely related. (If it were me, I would remove all but the first sentence of the first paragraph to just before paragraph 4.) §3.1, 2nd bullet s/psedowires/pseudowires (2 times) §4: This section would benefit from a definition (or citation to a definition) of "orchestration", especially to distinguish between "service orchestration" and "network orchestration". (It may be that the target audience all knows the terms, but it's been my experience that everyone thinks they know what "orchestration" means, but they often do not agree on the definition. )
- [L2sm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- [L2sm] R: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Fioccola Giuseppe