Re: [L2sm] Proposed Liaison to 3GPP SA5

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 05 June 2018 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A720E127333 for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KuoysR-i5R8j for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4FA313110C for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w55HahBD014551; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:36:43 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B498A220DF; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:36:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FDA8220DE; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:36:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (243.125.113.87.dyn.plus.net [87.113.125.243]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w55Hag98024005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:36:42 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Roque Gagliano \(rogaglia\)'" <rogaglia@cisco.com>, <l2sm@ietf.org>
References: <000901d3fbf5$5648d790$02da86b0$@olddog.co.uk> <7ee2d1342bf6403583d834a1ae3f2d7d@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <01a901d3fce6$00486b20$00d94160$@olddog.co.uk> <2717B04F-A52D-4F07-BCD6-54672978429E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2717B04F-A52D-4F07-BCD6-54672978429E@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:36:40 +0100
Message-ID: <01c401d3fcf3$c389b230$4a9d1690$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIOf7qJKx24xl1w/pQ68zsvGbGRtQGs1yWjAcptn+ICAJuhN6OxHPOA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.113.125.243
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-23890.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--50.498-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--50.498-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-23890.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--50.497900-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: CxmI61mtwh/bjF84eGLr8k+0VUW65/MLQPCWRE0Lo8LdeAKnvBMxfALy tDvV39h+AXD2Dy6mJx+tYxQPBCTfivOiuaIlOpQJr3X9gdfSLWUjkrgJ37Rqj9CmiQVJO8KAPhm ZwYOHfXFqd9e2shDchbqFW2kLk5WxQgUInkqQBs/x5KZMlKYS/VHewY36PuY0B6d3D+KIwZCXZl I8Bj2/wcxRhu+lYIcVh8RJbAqfy+ZNzXckEGP5NPph0S97szoiQPCPzycuBFNrKNt7ipQiY/7np 1jxGcSc4jYsFvT+2G1cMa0vBLLAWVY7htTmQNk8xZQoGMRGhhNr9+Kgn2XgeDyC5ddG2JcglFgS sn3+4tvFrO98alTluhkRQQkCJZ2uYI5gdEg+G0+GuzokAQvW7uNZPwab8qQd/k12Sb2MaHle02g z/kts1wv/EwG4HFqlWSoI72TvMKGjW4GVOvnvICjQ4osdfamBmIYIWwCrtbAR34ro7k23nbLVWp rbhV6Z/KTHyj9MEwIjYLXFlcEXyCNCFng30qlISEQN/D/3cG4LitYSIrUiB4jOeYAk0kzl+lmoP 29sICOVAyN805wP/WWmvbaMpVogS5OmIehwqWHB89bZodSoLeQhKnemH5f0lr1+vRYkAQ8vFyEY NiTbqnpRvZak50H1SffHhU8txs2LANNIEoQXaeQ9pghGhYnuqP4nHMi9FuOcG06UYbHuTUqWMVa 169sCzFbEyrjl57bgN+jRiSVzRG9IORkCfTwjWykFCbrZmkftjZF0DaZLCWYJuLvc/mPOc2uURv 2pMpRviKAJEeUC3jk2sxk9/brkpr2Alh5hvMyeAiCmPx4NwFkMvWAuahr80AUPEgVMzF988Plw9 Yn01wtuKBGekqUpIG4YlbCDECsWefvMt+drgg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/5-i4cXdr1VXYC7fIHhzw5gYhrL4>
Subject: Re: [L2sm] Proposed Liaison to 3GPP SA5
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 17:36:54 -0000

Hi Roque,

Well, both documents went through IETF last call, and both 8309 and 8199 have IETF consensus. As it says in the boilerplate for both documents.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).

And as 8309 says

   This document describes service models as used within the IETF and
   also shows where a service model might fit into a software-defined
   networking architecture.

So can you clarify what your concern is? 

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia) [mailto:rogaglia@cisco.com]
> Sent: 05 June 2018 17:42
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'Fioccola Giuseppe'; l2sm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [L2sm] Proposed Liaison to 3GPP SA5
> 
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> I agree that sending this message is a good idea.
> 
> However, I do not think the RFC 8309 is "explaining what the IETF means by the
> term "Service Model". This is an informational document and as such does not
> represent consensus or recommendation per RFC 2026. Personally, I agree with
> Giuseppe that RFC 8199 is a better document but that is also an informational
> document.
> 
> I better text could be:
> "RFC 8199 and RFC 8309 are informational documents developed by the IETF
> community to show examples on how service models could be implemented."
> 
> Regards,
> Roque
> 
> 
> On 05/06/18 17:58, "L2sm on behalf of Adrian Farrel" <l2sm-bounces@ietf.org on
> behalf of adrian@olddog.co.uk>; wrote:
> 
>     Yes, good point.
> 
>     A
> 
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Fioccola Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it]
>     > Sent: 05 June 2018 16:01
>     > To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; l2sm@ietf.org
>     > Subject: RE: [L2sm] Proposed Liaison to 3GPP SA5
>     >
>     > Hi Adrian, All,
>     > I absolutely agree with the proposed Liaison to 3GPP SA5. I would also
> suggest
>     to
>     > mention RFC8199 on YANG Module Classification.
>     >
>     > Best Regards,
>     >
>     > Giuseppe
>     >
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: L2sm [mailto:l2sm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>     > Sent: lunedì 4 giugno 2018 13:15
>     > To: l2sm@ietf.org
>     > Subject: [L2sm] Proposed Liaison to 3GPP SA5
>     >
>     > Hi WG,
>     >
>     > 3GPP SA5 is working on Management and orchestration of 5G networks and
>     > network slicing (http://www.3gpp.org/NEWS-EVENTS/3GPP-NEWS/1951-
>     > SA5_5G) and is considering various existing data models as references. 3GPP
>     > Release-15 is targeting freeze date of September 2018 and plan two meetings
> in
>     > June and August respectively to meet the deadline of 3GPP Release-15.
>     >
>     > They seem to have been soliciting input from various SDOs (most recently the
>     > BBF) but have not approached the IETF. This may be because they already
> know
>     > what we are working on, or it may be because they didn't realise.
>     >
>     > So Qin and I propose to send the following liaison statement to them for
>     > information. Since the next meeting is on June 26th, we think the deadline
> for
>     > sending this is should be June 15th.
>     >
>     > Any comments or edits would be welcomed.
>     >
>     > Thanks for any input or advice.
>     >
>     > Qin and Adrian
>     >
>     > === Draft LS ===
>     >
>     > To: 3GPP SA5
>     > Cc: Thomas Tovinger, 3GPP SA5 Chairman
>     >        Ignas Bagdonas and Warren Kumari, IETF Operations and Management
> ADs
>     > From: Qin Wu and Adrian Farrel, IETF L2SM working group co-chairs
>     > For: Information
>     >
>     > We note that 3GPP SA5 is working on Management and orchestration of 5G
>     > networks and network slicing (http://www.3gpp.org/NEWS-EVENTS/3GPP-
>     > NEWS/1951-SA5_5G) and is considering various existing data models as
>     > references. 3GPP Release-15 is targeting freeze date of September 2018 and
>     plan
>     > two meetings in June and August respectively to meet the deadline of 3GPP
>     > Release-15. We would like to take this opportunity to inform you of the status
>     of
>     > several pieces of work in the IETF that satisfy the transport support for
>     network
>     > slicing on IP services , L2 service, and TE service.
>     >
>     > RFC 8299 provides A YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery.
>     > This document is a published RFC with IETF consensus.
>     > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8299.txt
>     >
>     > draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model provides A YANG Data Model for L2VPN
>     > Service Delivery.
>     > This document has achieved working group and IETF consensus, and is
> currently
>     > completing approval for publication as an RFC.
>     > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-10.txt
>     >
>     > RFC 8309 sets the previous two documents in context by explaining what the
>     IETF
>     > means by the term "Service Model"
>     > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8309.txt
>     >
>     > You may also be interested in work in the TEAS working group on Abstraction
>     and
>     > Control of Traffic Engineered networks (ACTN).
>     > In particular, there is YANG model for Virtual Network operation in an ACTN
>     > context that may be of specific interest to you:
>     > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-00.txt
>     >
>     > Wishing you all success in your work,
>     > Qin Wu and Adrian Farrel
>     > Co-chairs, IETF L2SM working group
>     > ===END===
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > L2sm mailing list
>     > L2sm@ietf.org
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm
>     >
>     > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle
>     persone
>     > indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla
>     conoscenza di
>     > queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto
>     > questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata
>     > comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
>     >
>     > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged
>     > information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying,
>     printing
>     > or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
>     > please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by
> return
>     > e-mail, Thanks.
>     >
>     > Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     L2sm mailing list
>     L2sm@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm
>