Re: [L2sm] Adoption poll for draft-wen-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-03.txt

"Wen, Bin" <> Fri, 13 January 2017 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476A1299AB for <>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:58:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ykCrUJAkKX3H for <>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0851299AD for <>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:58:09 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 60721c4c-61fff70000007eaf-cd-5878504ebf57
Received: from ( []) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 2B.3C.32431.E4058785; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:58:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:58:04 -0500
Received: from ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:e278]) by ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:e278%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:58:04 -0500
From: "Wen, Bin" <>
To: "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [L2sm] Adoption poll for draft-wen-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-03.txt
Thread-Index: AdJBMl9LkbuTL93GR8uhCc0ETwHqcwsHt2uA
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:58:04 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <0d4501d24132$62ceb590$286c20b0$>
In-Reply-To: <0d4501d24132$62ceb590$286c20b0$>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrJIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUOxpoRsQUBFh8HKamcWPnhvMFndevmR0 YPJYsuQnk8eKzSsZA5iiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDImf1vPWrCWp6J561TWBsYWri5GTg4JAROJ y1vXMHUxcnEICcxkkuhet4EJJCEkcIhR4sIaOYjESUaJI7OmM4Mk2ATUJJ7OmsoOYosIBEk8 ad0FZgsLBErcWDoPyOYAi9+4IwdhGkl8XsoDYrIIqErM64gAMXkFzCSO3TIEMYUErCS+H2MF GcEpYC1xpPc12DhGATGJ76fWgN3CLCAucevJfCaIgwUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPwPrFdUQE9i9pQG doi4jsTZ608YIWwDia1L97FA2HISPTtaGSFm6kncmDqFDcJ2kJi39SsLhK0tsWzha7D5vAKC EidnPoHqFZc4fGQH6wRGqVlITpqFZNQsJKNmIRk1C8moBYysqxjlyhITU5JzM/JLSwyM9JIT k3JS9ZLzc5MTi0tA9CZGUAQXyfjsYPw0zeMQowAHoxIPr6hdRYQQa2JZcWUuMGY4mJVEeOW8 gEK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5t9/UjBASSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJMnFwSjUwzq9ultA+ XHGnVf4fk23oqSNmmdXaRh+rWq+U+ijyXX1zxnniLu/DXwsO75i/d4le3uudLT8PhpoqXAhY NEtAsYX7t+y35p7jS9rYlmse+DB7+jPHh28ZcwviHx4TmDVnbr2bxfbKbN+3Lusz727lnvr7 taiS81HNnAvPPYJMRGW2WvmUeVduVGIpzkg01GIuKk4EABp/EJDcAgAA
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [L2sm] Adoption poll for draft-wen-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-03.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:58:23 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft. From operator perspective, it¹s
important to decouple customer service model from the actual service
delivery method. 

The current draft needs to be updated. However, it¹s a good

On 11/17/16, 7:26 PM, "L2sm on behalf of Adrian Farrel"
< on behalf of> wrote:

>Our charter mandates that we consider basing our work on
>As we discussed in the meeting, that draft is not perfect. But when I
>asked the
>room whether we thought that it would provide a good starting point that
>could work with to polish and adapt to become the I-D that we ultimately
>for publication as an RFC, I believe I heard a good hum in favour and
>silence in
>So this email starts a formal poll for adoption. Please answer:
>Do you think that the WG should adopt
>If "yes," it would help if you could indicate whether you have read the
>and how happy you are with it.
>If "no", it is important that you provide reasons.
>This poll will last for two weeks, ending on Saturday 3rd December.
>Just to reassure everyone that adoption does not imply that anything is
>set in
>stone: we expect the WG to continue to develop the content and change
>needs to be changed.
>Adrian and Qin
>L2sm mailing list