[L2sm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8466 (5615)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 28 January 2019 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B331277CC for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:18:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKzOQ5AsP0Ws for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B70412008F for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DC8DDB82503; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:17:53 -0800 (PST)
To: bin_wen@comcast.com, giuseppe.fioccola@tim.it, xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn, luay.jalil@verizon.com, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk, bill.wu@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org, l2sm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20190128131753.DC8DDB82503@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/JH_rMMqTavulbnX_-V0m8slsIRI>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:53:56 -0800
Subject: [L2sm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8466 (5615)
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:18:03 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8466,
"A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5615

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org>;

Section: 5.10.1

Original Text
-------------
   The svc-bandwidth parameter must include a "cos-id" parameter if the
   "type" is set to "bw-per-cos".  The cos-id can be assigned based on
   either (1) the IEEE 802.1p value [IEEE-802-1D] in the C-tag or
   (2) the Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) in the Ethernet
   frame header.  Service frames are metered against the bandwidth
   profile based on the cos-id.

Corrected Text
--------------
   The svc-bandwidth parameter must include a "cos-id" parameter if the
   "type" is set to "bw-per-cos".  The cos-id can be assigned based on
   either (1) the IEEE 802.1p value [IEEE-802-1D] in the C-tag or
   (2) the Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) in the IP
   header.  Service frames are metered against the bandwidth
   profile based on the cos-id.

Notes
-----
The DSCP field is part of the IP packet header, not the Ethernet frame руфвук.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8466 (draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery
Publication Date    : October 2018
Author(s)           : B. Wen, G. Fioccola, Ed., C. Xie, L. Jalil
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : L2VPN Service Model
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG