Re: [L2sm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-l2sm-00-06: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5649129988; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 04:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZIgLXbpEtg6T; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 04:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812E0129971; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 04:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4849; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478172147; x=1479381747; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ou4f/i9cY/8YCr6u7vwvtUbpfoqycpmulFchUsMASgE=; b=fNnicliHZEAlocl7t8qiCoQWq44W6RnL3VTz3nrvM8y2maFAAR947/78 N/Au58LTxKKKoYNW49P6FB/Y1ogKhHqrUUhQjkKY6PA+1X9Mfz0dr+ehF EHA6avdjKewEIa5OzBA+N624rkMrWqJS88gj4NtcYCgTRMfmGAvO2Za65 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AkAQDCHBtY/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgnM9AQEBAQF3Ko4Jln+PL4MJgg+CCCiFegKCYxQBAgEBAQEBAQF?= =?us-ascii?q?iKIRiAQEEI1YQCxgqAgJXBgEMCAEBiFIOrU6NAAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBARcFhj+BfQiCUIQZEQGDIIJcBYhJBZFShjSKCYFuhG+DGIYViUSDWYQEHjd?= =?us-ascii?q?ZCQmFID2GAoIsAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,438,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="647845710"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Nov 2016 11:22:24 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA3BMNYB021896; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:22:24 GMT
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <147813992718.24057.8654858944560143534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ab972a62-a501-536a-6615-5913cbafacee@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:22:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <147813992718.24057.8654858944560143534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6F3C61B73BAA6C876C7F41A0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/LLCslt-qkRy4S_jRgTILriu-Q2g>
Cc: l2sm-chairs@ietf.org, l2sm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [L2sm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-l2sm-00-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 11:22:29 -0000

On 11/3/2016 3:25 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-l2sm-00-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-l2sm/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> A strictly editorial comment:
>
> The second sentence in the third paragraph would benefit from being
> broken into a few shorter sentences.
You're right.
New text, proposed by Adrian:

The working group will derive a single data model that includes support 
for the following:

- point-to-point Virtual Private Wire Services (VPWS),

- multipoint Virtual Private LAN services (VPLS) that use LDP-signaled 
Pseudowires

- multipoint Virtual Private LAN services (VPLS) that use a Border 
Gateway Protocol

(BGP) control plane as described in RFC4761 and RFC6624

- Ethernet VPNs specified in RFC 7432

Regards, Benoit
>
> .
>