[L2sm] L2SM not meeting in Chicago

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 08 February 2017 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F721293D6 for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 04:27:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jO086mspWqmQ for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 04:27:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C06231299FC for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 04:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain []) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v18CQuwC023782; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:26:56 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v18CQprN023763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:26:55 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <l2sm@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:26:47 -0000
Message-ID: <068e01d28206$a2b4fab0$e81ef010$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdKCBpiJIug9PUVsRWy08N15q+zMLg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.915-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.915-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: r95+d//5g9eR8u6DOJbzpziPEKUh+xB+q8zyGnyMiHTnt4o2/Vm8Behu cPsHg+lU4gjwtqdxrGS2ApteWXXPToMB3UO03Wrtr51gSC67hpVt3qsaFY4DBO/FI0vC1VAHHSG EZ3gt1f6tfVFB3sECOW793anBBL+URrYNcarBmZ+4jAucHcCqnS3S35ohUu37TuOOxH2rT/ERZc CYVXElTiEn+59qml4SkZOl7WKIImq0P2qkGU0XypaWKijZlsbB2bNx1HEv7HAqtq5d3cxkNSAqw XSxSoYzHcwxoDHBQo/kJXWEjMMNnAjp3WgmyVwgoLKX6ZUUeAg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/M_dFqFx3ChE3BfeALP9_oUNh7pw>
Cc: bclaise@cisco.com
Subject: [L2sm] L2SM not meeting in Chicago
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:27:03 -0000

Hi working group,

The chairs believe that there is currently nothing to be gained from an L2SM WG
meeting in Chicago.

Rest assured that the draft authors are working on the document in the
background. Tasks have included:

- Checking the "technology-specific" parameters to ensure that they are
   applicable to the CE-PE access links and not to how the VPN is implemented
   by the provider.

- Looking at "cloud services"

- Adding examples

- Cross-checking how to reference relevant MEF work

There is a plan to get a new revision posted "soon".

In the meantime:
- You are all very welcome continued discussion on the list
- Please speak up if you have a topic you want to address in a 
  face-to-face meeting

Adrian and Qin