[L2sm] The I-D we mentioned that discussed "service models"

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 17 November 2016 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5751C129627 for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:50:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2B6oLeCNuZOp for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D593129478 for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uAH1oGeA032430 for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:50:16 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-8717.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.135.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uAH1oC5k032416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:50:15 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <l2sm@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:50:11 -0000
Message-ID: <092601d24074$f0a40230$d1ec0690$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdJAdOwHxn/mPPqOTZ60iHj+kJtYcg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22704.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No--7.033-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--7.033-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 9KhQTl9YfS9R6DT7jy4uvam4PbloS2C3+KgiyLtJrSDLuEdMBn2IDBch drJv3xSnQg7ami9Nm5ToCQmdfigNPnojljdZUlWjtT4jIeGRd/VBldmDYjwlpijPntpmZSbDk1F e0KkV71PQVt5FSA+AZ5Zh+q4adi+mGAdnzrnkM485f9Xw/xqKXdivpTdmVCR22bNx1HEv7HAqtq 5d3cxkNRME7z1CCNiPw76LMAJE07u0XMCOh6R71LgcO/s7mXpz6KibADJHm1DAvpLE+mvX8g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/Myw9vRVsgk5EcR-lvG6URBkuIq4>
Subject: [L2sm] The I-D we mentioned that discussed "service models"
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:50:21 -0000

Hi,

Benoit pointed our discussion of "what is a service model" to:
- The OPSAWG mailing list
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained/

Noting that this is not an OPSAWG draft at the moment, but that there was
(apparently) some support for working on it when it was presented in the OPSAWG
meeting this week.

See also the slides for that presentation at
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-opsawg-service-model-explai
ned-00.pdf

I think what Benoit means is "Please have the discussion in OPSAWG so that we
can reach an Area-wide decision and then apply it to L2SM."

Thanks,
Adrian