[L2sm] [Errata Verified] RFC8466 (5615)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 09 July 2019 12:02 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA7C1203F2; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWNIrqImqwxv; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46514120457; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C04DAB81634; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: nmalykh@ieee.org, bin_wen@comcast.com, giuseppe.fioccola@tim.it, xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn, luay.jalil@verizon.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ibagdona@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, l2sm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190709120238.C04DAB81634@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 05:02:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/VAfXl1gW3NPN61ocP9vgVWrmr0c>
Subject: [L2sm] [Errata Verified] RFC8466 (5615)
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:02:51 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8466, "A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5615 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org> Date Reported: 2019-01-28 Verified by: Ignas Bagdonas (IESG) Section: 5.10.1 Original Text ------------- The svc-bandwidth parameter must include a "cos-id" parameter if the "type" is set to "bw-per-cos". The cos-id can be assigned based on either (1) the IEEE 802.1p value [IEEE-802-1D] in the C-tag or (2) the Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) in the Ethernet frame header. Service frames are metered against the bandwidth profile based on the cos-id. Corrected Text -------------- The svc-bandwidth parameter must include a "cos-id" parameter if the "type" is set to "bw-per-cos". The cos-id can be assigned based on either (1) the IEEE 802.1p value [IEEE-802-1D] in the C-tag or (2) the Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) in the IP header. Service frames are metered against the bandwidth profile based on the cos-id. Notes ----- The DSCP field is part of the IP packet header, not the Ethernet frame руфвук. -------------------------------------- RFC8466 (draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-10) -------------------------------------- Title : A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery Publication Date : October 2018 Author(s) : B. Wen, G. Fioccola, Ed., C. Xie, L. Jalil Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : L2VPN Service Model Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [L2sm] [Errata Verified] RFC8466 (5615) RFC Errata System