Re: [L2sm] L2SM not meeting in Chicago

John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com> Wed, 08 February 2017 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <strazpdj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D22A129485 for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:11:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KBUWDJwvnosX for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:11:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0EAA12943B for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:11:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v186so85944400lfa.1 for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:11:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RZ9q0kP3d2q3R+R6XHUVG6VQWqwHmZyYLIJNNJnimoo=; b=DuTABbyWsU3Ekvv28kC1c55vlOgiGmA3eQ0LuTSR8X9X2Ob/dlneh1WQfwe4T8QjV/ HE0NErGG1MS8tRfoB79krENoMMNH/+r2o4YnGWAvARNJ6JnFZDYOJAYstvgjqsHTSDHH lcZLuL56y7wA/H3APEEmOf7G7xmx4Qn5mxMJTcULdsFI8+lKhTapJReZyTI3GQmmNmul n++sWYGlk1tLCqnEs6LaOBAAR/yBEViWmIP4kf6dsLc56C2HCeARqjr7P+CnYQjmjAlQ hlw+RO1oTimQiiTqJusqD4JvlzaUf/tG0b5SVplktjwtNYv9Bn9ra8e0is0UrQMUZ9+4 OPfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RZ9q0kP3d2q3R+R6XHUVG6VQWqwHmZyYLIJNNJnimoo=; b=rLZOK1AbsXev45zhStDEeLx/NIy0oYcjn27E1SJyAOUMSe5acaLFjh+EqcoFSxnmkl nF+TaII0290CX+lgl2UuaDk9wUl/Yli6JCdGUt13CI7Sksw1uCQ9/ru/Sxe7CBQdn6gK 2M/IdRDhca2TiwwgX4x7htOa5OHVUri63GT3zBobjleDXKg5KEYc4HvPGcgBa1VjxMrn K+Hs2tcSD0s5xLac2LpFMstLGk8OM4etD9Qk3I/xqM059DLTH1d0PqjjLKr+iTFotmV0 5xIscKbawqnfesrnBpHFCC/cizjgdcY3jtxK+y9Joy91/oD0d7afhM+KsmuSR1FvnoNI fC0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKz56SAUxG0JnJbOfUNhb/FcKhU7YEPv7l9cXh8ICpWJliAIN6rEv3fl+QMxaDQxzrb8lGdaz4Ss0n8aw==
X-Received: by 10.25.40.4 with SMTP id o4mr8209228lfo.1.1486573902988; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:11:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.21.203 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:11:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <068e01d28206$a2b4fab0$e81ef010$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <068e01d28206$a2b4fab0$e81ef010$@olddog.co.uk>
From: John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:11:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJwYUrFvbJDpBZaFv4wQ94vniUxfEWko5z0C+p60CJ3gQQXtsg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11410e586b8e2d054807f5e6
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/YAxvHtoeS76F7ZqD3YQBQwwoCuc>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, l2sm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [L2sm] L2SM not meeting in Chicago
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:11:46 -0000

Hi all,

I am happy to provide advice on the relevant MEF work. Other sources are
Scott Mansfield and David Ball. Best way to get a hold of me is
strazpdj@gmail.com, or by offering coffee and/or scotch. :-)

regards,
John

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi working group,
>
> The chairs believe that there is currently nothing to be gained from an
> L2SM WG
> meeting in Chicago.
>
> Rest assured that the draft authors are working on the document in the
> background. Tasks have included:
>
> - Checking the "technology-specific" parameters to ensure that they are
>    applicable to the CE-PE access links and not to how the VPN is
> implemented
>    by the provider.
>
> - Looking at "cloud services"
>
> - Adding examples
>
> - Cross-checking how to reference relevant MEF work
>
> There is a plan to get a new revision posted "soon".
>
> In the meantime:
> - You are all very welcome continued discussion on the list
> - Please speak up if you have a topic you want to address in a
>   face-to-face meeting
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian and Qin
>
> _______________________________________________
> L2sm mailing list
> L2sm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm
>



-- 
regards,
John