[L2sm] LAG and loop avoidance

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 11 October 2017 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4FE134305 for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 05:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.08
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auSxdBLQFpJT for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4416513430A for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 05:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain []) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v9BCegB4006806 for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:40:43 +0100
Received: from 950129200 ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v9BCefJI006775 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:40:42 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: l2sm@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:40:43 +0100
Message-ID: <05ab01d3428e$27cfdec0$776f9c40$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdNCjbeq+p5xnUrfQcau7I8eVts+OQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--2.841-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--2.841-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: tcF3I8fd45garBIr98KMDqDH6drx3JPVOhJ9m53n4aC7+NPPxj+R6gOR 3tZA0vji4vM1YF6AJbZcLc3sLtjOt7bmZosI/5Zy3QfwsVk0UbuGrPnef/I+evTCZDzmvFbXB69 F3D4Yb+wCcTs8LdHbfihsjASgWAEpSyDzDHRrD92vcsTuUejg0omQ2vqumwAFVUH85vIcwrl2A/ 3Nl4P8kQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/w78fpXkm8ZENslWOKmRxb1C5r8c>
Subject: [L2sm] LAG and loop avoidance
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:40:48 -0000

Hi WG,

We had an action item to look at loop avoidance especially with regard to LAGs.

The interim discussed this and decided that everything is covered in the
existing module.

Please speak up now if you still have an issue with this. Otherwise we'll move