[L2sm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8466 (6699)

Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com> Fri, 01 October 2021 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <arusso@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0C13A0D16; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdJeCRY9vuOt; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51873A0D60; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E49428B4E5; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lTZie2dk5Nc9; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.33] (c-24-17-19-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.17.19.210]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F1794237BF8; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211001081755.35436F40772@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:09:41 -0700
Cc: ops-ads@ietf.org, bin_wen@comcast.com, giuseppe.fioccola@tim.it, xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn, luay.jalil@verizon.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, l2sm@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <36F21567-69D8-4AF7-803B-A2DBD2DF82A6@amsl.com>
References: <20211001081755.35436F40772@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/wRbW8QjNlEHo744h5Piw7M1wxX4>
Subject: [L2sm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8466 (6699)
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 16:10:16 -0000

FYI, in this report, the RFC number has been corrected from RFC 8644 to RFC 8466.
Please see below for details.

RFC Editor/ar

> On Oct 1, 2021, at 1:17 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for
RFC 8466, "A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6699
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> 
> Section: 8
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>                  container lacp {
>                    if-feature "lacp";
>                    leaf enabled {
>                      type boolean;
>                      default "false";
>                      description
>                        "LACP on/off.  By default, LACP is disabled.";
>                    }
>                    leaf mode {
>                      type neg-mode;
>                      description
>                        "LACP mode.  LACP modes have active mode and
>                         passive mode ('false').  'Active mode' means
>                         initiating the auto-speed negotiation and
>                         trying to form an Ethernet channel with the
>                         other end.  'Passive mode' means not initiating
>                         the negotiation but responding to LACP packets
>                         initiated by the other end (e.g., full duplex
>                         or half duplex).";
>                    }
> 
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 
>                  container lacp {
>                    if-feature "lacp";
>                    leaf enabled {
>                      type boolean;
>                      default "false";
>                      description
>                        "LACP on/off.  By default, LACP is disabled.";
>                    }
>                    leaf mode {
>                      type identityref {
>                        base lacp-mode;
>                      }
>                      description
>                        "LACP mode. LACP modes have active mode and
>                         passive mode ('false').  'Active mode' means
>                         initiating the auto-speed negotiation and
>                         trying to form an Ethernet channel with the
>                         other end.  'Passive mode' means not initiating
>                         the negotiation but responding to LACP packets
>                         initiated by the other end (e.g., full duplex
>                         or half duplex).";
>                    }
> 
> 
> Also, make this change: 
> 
> OLD:
> 
>           |  +--rw lag-interfaces {lag-interface}?
>           |  |  +--rw lag-interface* [index]
>           |  |     +--rw index    string
>           |  |     +--rw lacp {lacp}?
>           |  |        +--rw enabled?           boolean
>           |  |        +--rw mode?              neg-mode
> 
> NEW:
> 
>           |  +--rw lag-interfaces {lag-interface}?
>           |  |  +--rw lag-interface* [index]
>           |  |     +--rw index    string
>           |  |     +--rw lacp {lacp}?
>           |  |        +--rw enabled?           boolean
>           |  |        +--rw mode?              identityref
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The LACP mode can be set to active or passive, which is not what neg-mode is supposed to cover. lacp-mode identity should be used, instead.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
RFC8466 (draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-10)
> --------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery
Publication Date    : October 2018
Author(s)           : B. Wen, G. Fioccola, Ed., C. Xie, L. Jalil
Category            : Standards Track 
Source              : L2VPN Service Model
Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>