[L2tpext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-07: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 01 November 2016 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: l2tpext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0585D1294D8; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.37.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147803374897.23948.16524317900779414186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:55:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2tpext/88ydLRZwfoepMeeaZucmScWuYUw>
Cc: cpignata@cisco.com, draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel@ietf.org, l2tpext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel.all@ietf.org, l2tpext@ietf.org
Subject: [L2tpext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2tpext/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:55:49 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have just a few minor comments: - 1, 2nd paragraph: The first sentence is convoluterd; can it be simplified? -- "upon receipt on each tunnel": on receipt of packets? -6: Please expand OAM, MEP, and MIP on first mention. -11.2: RFCs 1981, 4623, 4720, 5085. 5883, and 5885 are all cited in the context of 2119 language. They should probably be normative references. (In my opinion, even citations for optional features need normative references if they are needed to fully understand the features.)
- [L2tpext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell