Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-07.txt

Olivier Dornon <olivier.dornon@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <olivier.dornon@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96561A8AD6 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f0FURa0p-Eg6 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5B01A8ABD for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 8B9C2BD01F83B for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:37:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9OCbZ46012394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:37:35 +0200
Received: from [138.203.14.165] (135.239.27.40) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:37:35 +0200
Message-ID: <544A480E.7030009@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:37:34 +0200
From: Olivier Dornon <olivier.dornon@alcatel-lucent.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-07.txt
References: <20141024123255.26977.94049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141024123255.26977.94049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.40]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/1Glemf7s-bPPg3Iuuw5NqNB29r4
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:37:39 -0000

This version of the draft contains changes based on Eric's and Nabil's 
review.

There are still a number of open topics under discussion, a new version 
addressing these will be submitted soon.

Olivier.

On 10/24/2014 02:32 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>   This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) over Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)
>          Authors         : Olivier Dornon
>                            Jayant Kotalwar
>                            Venu Hemige
>                            Ray Qiu
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 39
> 	Date            : 2014-10-24
>
> Abstract:
>     This document describes the procedures and recommendations for
>     Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Provider Edges (PEs) to facilitate
>     replication of multicast traffic to only certain ports (behind which
>     there are interested Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) routers
>     and/or Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) hosts) via Protocol
>     Independent Multicast (PIM) snooping and proxying.
>
>     With PIM snooping, PEs passively listen to certain PIM control
>     messages to build control and forwarding states while transparently
>     flooding those messages.  With PIM proxying, Provider Edges (PEs) do
>     not flood PIM Join/Prune messages but only generate their own and
>     send out of certain ports, based on the control states built from
>     downstream Join/Prune messages.  PIM proxying is required when PIM
>     Join suppression is enabled on the Customer Equipment (CE) devices
>     and useful to reduce PIM control traffic in a VPLS domain.
>
>     The document also describes PIM relay, which can be viewed as light-
>     weight proxying, where all downstream Join/Prune messages are simply
>     forwarded out of certain ports but not flooded to avoid triggering
>     PIM Join suppression on CE devices.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-07
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>