Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Thu, 27 February 2014 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199EB1A0382 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:03:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WS4M2hpKeN6G for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9101A0395 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.122] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145C5270AFB0; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:03:51 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1C7DE350-0450-4D97-BEF8-E2FEB7785CDF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <B23247FA-7CED-4F78-8858-076CA83F613C@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:03:49 -0500
Message-Id: <9F1DDAAE-BF29-48A8-BFDD-960F8F5A65F3@lucidvision.com>
References: <CAPCgso32vYqPEq4upa1FG78quZwBOJpzsCSCYTX2R7XgHzLiNA@mail.gmail.com> <B23247FA-7CED-4F78-8858-076CA83F613C@broadcom.com>
To: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/1rh6OiuAVsle5BtMGzXyIk8Rdmw
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>, Pradeep Jain <pradeep@nuagenetworks.net>, Vinay Bannai <vbannai@paypal.com>, Ravi Shekhar <rshekhar@juniper.net>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:03:59 -0000

	I had precisely the same question.  Most DCs simply use IP/Enet which allow for the use of the "regular suspects" in the tools department. 

	The other concern I have with specifying new tools on top of the underlay is that the underlay probably is running some diag tools for failure detection/trouble-shooting too (like Ethernet OAM/BFD/etc...), so once again we have the issue to consider of OAM traffic consuming significant amounts of actual BW.  Given how modern applications are built and run, its unlikely we need anything heavy weight in the overlay and can instead allow for application resiliency to handle failure detection, and instead have the "normal" tools available for trouble-shooting on an as-needed basis.

	--Tom



> Hi
> 
> Why don't you use existing IP based OAM messages such as BFD, OWAMP, TWAMP, etc.
> 
> Regards,
> Shahram
> 
> 
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 7:46 AM, "Kanwar Singh" <kanwar@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> We have submitted the below draft that proposes Generic OAM and Datapath Failure Detection Mechanism(s) for Overlay Networks.
>> 
>> We would like to solicit inputs from the members of L2VPN WG.
>> 
>> Please review the same and update us with your inputs/feedback.
>> 
>> Warm Regards
>> - Kanwar
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Kanwar Singh and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Name:           draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam
>> 
>> Revision:       01
>> Title:          Generic Overlay OAM and Datapath Failure Detection
>> 
>> 
>> Document date:  2014-02-12
>> 
>> Group:          Individual Submission
>> 
>> Pages:          44
>> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
>> 
>> 
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam/
>> 
>> 
>> Htmlized:      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01
>> 
>> 
>> Diff:              http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>> 
>> 
>>    This proposal describes a mechanism that can be used to detect Data
>> 
>> 
>>    Path Failures of various overlay technologies as VXLAN, NVGRE,
>> 
>> 
>>    MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP and verifying/sanity of their Control and Data
>> 
>> 
>>    Plane for given Overlay Segment.  This document defines the following
>> 
>> 
>>    for each of the above Overlay Technologies:
>> 
>> 
>>    o  Encapsulation of OAM Packet, such that it has same Outer and
>> 
>> 
>>       Overlay Header as any End-System's data going over the same
>> 
>> 
>>       Overlay Segment.
>> 
>> 
>>    o  The mechanism to trace the Underlay that is exercised by any
>> 
>> 
>>       Overlay Segment.
>> 
>> 
>>    o  Procedure to verify presence of any given Tenant VM or End-System
>> 
>> 
>>       within a given Overlay Segment at Overlay End-Point.
>> 
>> 
>>    Even though the present proposal addresses Overlay OAM for VXLAN,
>> 
>> 
>>    NVGRE, MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP, but the procedures described are
>> 
>> 
>>    generic enough to accommodate OAM for any other Overlay Technology.
>> 
>>