Re: MAC route with IP

[Aldrin Isaac <[e-mail]>]

Btw should "in such scenerarios when" be "in such scenarios where" ?

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>  Hi Jakob,
>
>  Changed your sentence to: "In such scenarios when the ARP entry times
> out and causes the MAC/IP to be withdrawn, then the MAC information will
> not be lost."
>
>  Cheers,
> Ali
>
>   From: Jakob Heitz <[e-mail]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>
> >
> Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:09 AM
> To: Cisco Employee <[e-mail]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>
> >
> Cc: Aldrin Isaac <[e-mail]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>>,
> John E Drake <[e-mail]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>>,
> "[e-mail] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>" <
> [e-mail] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>>, Antoni
> Przygienda <[e-mail]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>
> >
> Subject: Re: MAC route with IP
>
>   "Note that a MAC-only route can be advertised along with but
> independently of a MAC/IP route in scenarios where the MAC learning over
> the access network is done in the data-plane and independently of ARP
> snooping that generates the MAC/IP route. This ensures that if the ARP
> entry times out and causes the MAC/IP to be withdrawn, then the MAC
> information will not be lost. In scenarios where the host MAC/IP is learned
> via the management or control planes, the sender PE may advertise only the
> MAC/IP route."
>
> --
> Jakob Heitz.
>
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 11:22 PM, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>
>  Hi Aldrin,
>
>  How about the following:
>
>  "Note that a MAC-only route can be advertised along with but independent
> from MAC/IP route for scenarios where the MAC learning over access
> network/node is done in data-plane and independent from ARP snooping that
> generates MAC/IP route. In scenarios where host MAC/IP is learned via
> management or control plane, then the sender PE may only generates and
> advertises MAC/IP route."
>
>  Cheers,
> Ali
>
>   From: Aldrin Isaac <[e-mail]>
> Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 8:02 PM
> To: Cisco Employee <[e-mail]>
> Cc: John E Drake <[e-mail]>et>, Jakob Heitz <
> [e-mail]>gt;, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>rg>, Antoni
> Przygienda <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: MAC route with IP
>
>  How about:
>
>  "Note that a MAC-only route can be advertised along with MAC/IP
> routes for use cases where an active MAC must remain reachable when all
> IP's become disassociated with that MAC."
>
> On Tuesday, May 13, 2014, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>  Hi Aldrin,
>
>  I believe the application of MAC/IP route in section 10 is clear.
> However, if you think we can make further clarification, please suggest the
> text. We need to make sure the functionality that we specify is clearly
> described and explained. We don't need to describe/mention the
> functionality that is not used/needed.
>
>  Thanks,
> Ali
>
>   From: Aldrin Isaac <[e-mail]>
> Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:14 AM
> To: Cisco Employee <[e-mail]>
> Cc: John E Drake <[e-mail]>et>, Jakob Heitz <
> [e-mail]>gt;, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>rg>, Antoni
> Przygienda <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: MAC route with IP
>
>  Would it be worthwhile to mention that MAC/IP routes should no
>
>