RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06.txt> (A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network) to Informational RFC
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 01 July 2014 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3051A03B4;
Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id JlV5UTTklRgy; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC57D1A0298;
Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s61GZaZ3025163;
Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:35:36 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com
[81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0)
by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s61GZZng025154
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:35:36 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20140701140926.22084.39160.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140701140926.22084.39160.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06.txt> (A Framework for
Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching
(MPLS) Network) to Informational RFC
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:35:31 +0100
Message-ID: <06de01cf954a$7a1eef80$6e5cce80$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKiB6t08OqYxLAxjk88iuw6Q9jg55nmhUPg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1017-20792.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--13.479-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--13.479-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: u7Yf2n7Ca/0zx9GDMr0HvzYTypjB3iDVuikHZcC6ceDgq9d1J0a/O5im
4buSmgpH8V45mwvllGXoKYK2JmCh9QDNPxu11HXj6Zzj+kMRBrZzHmTfB9+iM1eilmPI7oJlJ6z
xewT80+u+M6YdQNudN/T46ZQqogPQx0rLCvrztpl7k1ZHmKLF7bd2noO4P7rALraGNlLRahhCEG
bQKi8nMOnLZEAfqoLh75M4rUfNg42/VDG+xJ1b6JMSBMTQNiSAFJFr2qlKix+638ZUY6gSd65eM
GDt7ZPm6/9ByXcaPA+9ulegjmbzeKKnrGEaKkhZA9GEZfTBPeV9LQinZ4QefL6qvLNjDYTwfY9h
sM0xN70qtq5d3cxkNYxgEPIDh1GCPi2qxtOTM5rHwdrJZZKtmyfsmUrD0eSqlDSb/wYkl3Q=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/6mMGBfCQonqwyCt7xAjgu-ARwQg
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:35:42 -0000
Hi, Here are a few small comments that I found doing my review. They did not warrant holding up IETF last call, but can be fixed along the way... Cheers, Adrian === Section 2.2 has An E-Tree service has one or more Root ACs and many Leaf ACs. I suggest that "many" is not a necessary part of the definition although it may be probable in deployments. For the definition I think you need: An E-Tree service has one or more Root ACs and at least one Leaf AC. --- Section 2.3.1 para 2 s/fame/frame/ --- Figure 1 shows two notations "E-Tree". The associated arrows do not make it clear what is the extent of the E-tree since the top one and the bottom one show different edge points. Can you tidy that up? > -----Original Message----- > From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG > Sent: 01 July 2014 15:09 > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06.txt> (A Framework for > Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) > Network) to Informational RFC > > > The IESG has received a request from the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks > WG (l2vpn) to consider the following document: > - 'A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multiprotocol > Label Switching (MPLS) Network' > <draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-07-15. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.