RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05.txt

Duwenhua <duwenhua@hisilicon.com> Fri, 14 March 2014 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <duwenhua@hisilicon.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36041A0778 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ayRv7LFVxw9 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775321A07B4 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BEN98758; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:50:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:49:26 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.40) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:50:18 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.239]) by SZXEMA408-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:50:14 +0800
From: Duwenhua <duwenhua@hisilicon.com>
To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" <jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPKRlZQbrANLDuYE6idyyHXfvoLprdLqoggAHhV0CAAGb/gIAAdCIA
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:50:12 +0000
Message-ID: <4535442760C9C74B90334E7DFB3D5CC425E93ECC@SZXEMA512-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <4535442760C9C74B90334E7DFB3D5CC425E93E21@SZXEMA512-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CF4747EA.C6417%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF4747EA.C6417%sajassi@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.77.136]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/CzVeOdD_MIRVuevqgzm5i3IUH1g
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 02:38:38 -0700
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:50:31 -0000

Hi, Ali and Jorge
   Thanks for your clarify.
   I agree with your answer on the two questions.


> From: Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge) [mailto:jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:28 PM
> To: Duwenhua; 'internet-drafts@ietf.org'.org'; i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am not an author but I am interested in clarifying your first comment:
> In other words, you are suggesting to impose ingress translation (and
> eth-tag signaling), which to me is completely unnecessary for VLAN-based
> service interfaces. I would not put it in the draft.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:sajassi@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 2:50 AM
> To: Duwenhua
> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05.txt
> 
> 
> Hi Duwenhua,
> 
> On 3/13/14 4:42 AM, "Duwenhua" <duwenhua@hisilicon.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Dear Authors,
> >
> >      Please see my comments inline.
> >
> >> 6.1 VLAN Based Service Interface
> >>    translation for frames destined to its attached CEs. In such
> >>    scenarios, the Ethernet frames transported over MPLS/IP network
> >>    SHOULD remain tagged with the originating VID and a VID translation
> >>    MUST be supported in the data path and MUST be performed on the
> >>    disposition PE. The Ethernet Tag Identifier in all EVPN routes MUST
> >>    be set to 0.
> >     [Du Wenhua] Problem: 1)It will be confused for the disposition PE
> >to received different originating VIDs from different remote PEs;
> >                       2)Originating has no use to disposition PE(or
> >egress PE);
> >     Suggestion:  translating to normalized tag on imposition PE and
> >translating to local tag on disposition PE.
> 
> For VLAN-based service, at the disposition PE, the MPLS EVI label (and in turn
> bridge domain ID) can identify what local VID to be used. So, there is no
> need for translating VID to a normalized VID at the ingress and do another
> translation at the egress. All is needed, is to re-write the receiving VID with
> the local VID value identified by MPLS EVI label (and bridge domain ID).
> 
> 
> >
> >>
> >> 9.2.1. Constructing the BGP EVPN MAC/IP Address Advertisement
> >>
> >>    The MAC address length field is in bits and it is typically set to
> >>    48. However this specification enables specifying the MAC address as
> >>    a prefix; in which case, the MAC address length field is set to the
> >>    length of the prefix. This provides the ability to aggregate MAC
> >>    addresses if the deployment environment supports that.  The
> >> encoding
> >      [Du Wenhua] Problem: 1) It is not easy for DC PE to support MAC
> >prefix. MAC lookup is handled by Hash method instead of by TCAM ,
> >                           especially when MAC table has more than
> 1M
> >entries in DC.
> >                         2) MAC prefix has little use when considering
> >about MAC Move in DC.
> >     Suggestion: Would you please remove MAC prefix?
> 
> We can do that since AFAIK, there is not much demand for it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ali
> 
> >
> >                                                           Du
> Wenhua
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> >> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> >> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 8:11 AM
> >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> >> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
> >> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >> directories.
> >>  This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks
> >> Working Group of the IETF.
> >>
> >>         Title           : BGP MPLS Based Ethernet VPN
> >>         Authors         : Ali Sajassi
> >>                           Rahul Aggarwal
> >>                           Wim Henderickx
> >>                           Aldrin Isaac
> >>                           James Uttaro
> >> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05.txt
> >> 	Pages           : 49
> >> 	Date            : 2014-02-13
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>    This document describes procedures for BGP MPLS based Ethernet
> VPNs
> >>    (EVPN).
> >>
> >>
> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn/
> >>
> >> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05
> >>
> >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-05
> >>
> >>
> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >>submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> >>tools.ietf.org.
> >>
> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/