Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Fri, 09 May 2014 15:22 UTC
Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06A01A0013
for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id bTvTb9kW1NRX for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 9 May 2014 08:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0475C1A000D
for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=826; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
t=1399648935; x=1400858535;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id:
content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
bh=kOxVEwtrhAeegwBim9PX1H+u52yPx2NJYWyXDML6KDs=;
b=MEhx8r9QU0Z7ONnmlM9z6YXRofW/PaqLvPAluUFHjyG++pQE+O1op7Ou
mKAUb+pAlcR+eICtw4Fusd+md+FygWhEkZ+YhM9RmCfqxsv+B7HJmFwLJ
4OjoEAw5Ll/sZjVff/2E433VCMw1ynzO1ALWwrCkfP7K3NjBhLF7xlsDJ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAGDybFOtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABZgmUhT1jFTAGBFxZ0giwdHToXAQg2MRElAgQBEogtAxEBDMpqDYYfF4w7gTURAVeEQASXVYFygTyLYoVkgzaBdjk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1018,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="323701454"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152])
by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2014 15:22:15 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83])
by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s49FMEWb012994
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
Fri, 9 May 2014 15:22:14 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by
xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 9
May 2014 10:22:14 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
Thread-Topic: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
Thread-Index: AQHPa4bfKww+zA7e20SY4lQkWXSUDps4PFKA
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 15:22:14 +0000
Message-ID: <CF923E65.D36C4%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B036E21A-3AF1-4073-B1B3-7FFAF0430932@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [10.155.156.11]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BBEA926EF0ED884FA2B47FAE8C3F1011@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/DTWC90VeHbl2r6YncIdC7okRoW8
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 15:22:25 -0000
Giles, Thanks very much for the detailed review of this draft in preparation for the WG LC. I have received half a dozen rounds of comments from you with well over 100 comments in total and some of those comments took several rounds of emails to resolve. As the result of this process, we believe this draft is in better shape and thus helping us with the next stage of AD review after this WG LC is completed. Cheers, Ali On 5/9/14 6:01 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote: >This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 > >please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for >publication as a Standards Track RFC from the L2VPN WG. > >this last call will close on Friday 23rd May 2014. > >Nabil & Giles
- WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Giles Heron
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 John E Drake
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Yakov Rekhter
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Jeff Tantsura
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Ronald Bonica
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 UTTARO, JAMES
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 William Zayas
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Gregory Mirsky
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2… Loa Andersson
- Re: What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-iet… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Xialiang (Frank)
- 答复: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Lizhenbin
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Luay Jalil
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Duwenhua
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Mingui Zhang
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 chen.ran
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Giles Heron