Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
Anil Lohiya <alohiya@juniper.net> Thu, 27 February 2014 18:19 UTC
Return-Path: <alohiya@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 375E11A01AC for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:19:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.348
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=1.252] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zT0x-ioBe_-M for
<l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:18:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com
(va3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 020DA1A0163 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>;
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:18:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail232-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.238) by
VA3EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (10.7.40.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
14.1.225.22; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:54 +0000
Received: from mail232-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
mail232-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E974B5C0575;
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null);
IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -18
X-BigFish: VPS-18(zz98dI9371I936eIc85dhe0eahdb82hzz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzz8275ch1de098h1033IL17326ah8275bh8275dh18c673h1de097h186068hz2fh109h2a8h839hbe3he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh224fh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1fe8h1ff5h209eh20f0h2216h22d0h2336h2438h2461h2487h24ach24d7h2516h2545h255eh25cch24c1m1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail232-va3: domain of juniper.net designates
157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101;
envelope-from=alohiya@juniper.net;
helo=BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10009001)(428001)(199002)(24454002)(377424004)(189002)(377454003)(95416001)(74662001)(15975445006)(81816001)(83506001)(74502001)(66066001)(79102001)(95666003)(59766001)(81686001)(74706001)(93136001)(76482001)(51856001)(77096001)(46102001)(16236675002)(54316002)(65816001)(15202345003)(47446002)(53806001)(63696002)(31966008)(74366001)(56776001)(85306002)(54356001)(92726001)(83322001)(19580405001)(81542001)(19580395003)(77982001)(94316002)(80022001)(36756003)(74876001)(92566001)(81342001)(50986001)(93516002)(69226001)(83072002)(561944002)(76786001)(47976001)(94946001)(87936001)(86362001)(90146001)(47736001)(49866001)(80976001)(85852003)(56816005)(4396001)(76796001)(87266001)(2656002)(94096001);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB673;
H:BLUPR05MB198.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.239.14;
FPR:FEFCF91D.9EF45301.F7D341B8.59E4D0E1.2053A; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
LANG:en;
Received: from mail232-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail232-va3
(MessageSwitch) id 1393525131207926_14825;
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.244]) by
mail232-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E484B00064;
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by
VA3EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (10.7.99.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
14.16.227.3; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB673.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.206.16) by
BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.38) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 14.16.423.0; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB198.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.191.12) by
BLUPR05MB673.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.0.883.10; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:37 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB198.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.154]) by
BLUPR05MB198.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.154]) with mapi id
15.00.0883.010; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:36 +0000
From: Anil Lohiya <alohiya@juniper.net>
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "Henderickx,
Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
Thread-Topic: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPM9Ml3HZ2hXU6YEyQ1GTTphL/nZrJQcKAgAABS4CAAADRAP//nwYA
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:18:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CF34C0FC.7D7B%alohiya@juniper.net>
References: <CAPCgso32vYqPEq4upa1FG78quZwBOJpzsCSCYTX2R7XgHzLiNA@mail.gmail.com>
<B23247FA-7CED-4F78-8858-076CA83F613C@broadcom.com>
<CF351FD5.B21EA%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
<D26A6EDE-42D3-45A6-8FFC-3B1850433722@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <D26A6EDE-42D3-45A6-8FFC-3B1850433722@lucidvision.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.14]
x-forefront-prvs: 013568035E
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CF34C0FC7D7Balohiyajunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CRA-Verdict: 157.56.240.101$paypal.com%41552%4%DuplicateDomain-c684c95e-93ad-459f-9d80-96fa46cd75af.juniper.net%False%False%0$
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%PAYPAL.COM$RO%1$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/F0LUWiYduxCOKkWcwJ3JW4KbKRo
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>, Pradeep Jain <pradeep@nuagenetworks.net>,
Vinay Bannai <vbannai@paypal.com>, Ravi Shekhar <rshekhar@juniper.net>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:19:01 -0000
Existing ping/traceroute mechanisms don't work in the virtualized environment e.g. ping may report that IP reachability between the ingress and egress tunnel endpoints is fine but the end systems (i.e. VM, physical server etc.) connectivity for a tenant could still be broken. This is because ping only verifies basic connectivity between two endpoints in the underlay but NOT in the context of overlay segments. Hence, we need debugging tools that work in the overlay environment. Think why there was a need to have lsp ping ... requirement with IP overlays is not much different. Question is not whether applications are resilient or not... One can not ignore the fact that operators have to think about having the right tools when that "inevitable" call comes from their customer about deteriorating application performance or traffic blackhole and there are no tools today specific to overlay network debugging. - Anil From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com<mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> Date: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:05 AM To: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>> Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>" <l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>>, Pradeep Jain <pradeep@nuagenetworks.net<mailto:pradeep@nuagenetworks.net>>, Vinay Bannai <vbannai@paypal.com<mailto:vbannai@paypal.com>>, Ravi Shekhar <rshekhar@juniper.net<mailto:rshekhar@juniper.net>> Subject: Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt The question is, and perhaps the draft could explain this, is why existing tools a) are insufficient and b) cannot be modified. Operationally speaking, b is preferred if you ask me as learning a new tool/model for diagnosis and trouble-shooting is expensive and painful. For example, if we took the tact of reinventing say IP ping for every underlying transport, then we'd have 50 tools by now. --Tom On Feb 27, 2014:11:02 AM, at 11:02 AM, Henderickx, Wim (Wim) <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Because we also need to trace L2 endpoints besides IP endpoint. From: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com<mailto:davari@broadcom.com>> Date: Thursday 27 February 2014 16:58 To: Kanwar Singh <kanwar@nuagenetworks.net<mailto:kanwar@nuagenetworks.net>> Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>" <l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>>, Pradeep Jain <pradeep@nuagenetworks.net<mailto:pradeep@nuagenetworks.net>>, Vinay Bannai <vbannai@paypal.com<mailto:vbannai@paypal.com>>, Ravi Shekhar <rshekhar@juniper.net<mailto:rshekhar@juniper.net>> Subject: Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt Hi Why don't you use existing IP based OAM messages such as BFD, OWAMP, TWAMP, etc. Regards, Shahram On Feb 27, 2014, at 7:46 AM, "Kanwar Singh" <kanwar@nuagenetworks.net<mailto:kanwar@nuagenetworks.net>> wrote: Dear All, We have submitted the below draft that proposes Generic OAM and Datapath Failure Detection Mechanism(s) for Overlay Networks. We would like to solicit inputs from the members of L2VPN WG. Please review the same and update us with your inputs/feedback. Warm Regards - Kanwar A new version of I-D, draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Kanwar Singh and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam Revision: 01 Title: Generic Overlay OAM and Datapath Failure Detection Document date: 2014-02-12 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 44 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01 Abstract: This proposal describes a mechanism that can be used to detect Data Path Failures of various overlay technologies as VXLAN, NVGRE, MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP and verifying/sanity of their Control and Data Plane for given Overlay Segment. This document defines the following for each of the above Overlay Technologies: o Encapsulation of OAM Packet, such that it has same Outer and Overlay Header as any End-System's data going over the same Overlay Segment. o The mechanism to trace the Underlay that is exercised by any Overlay Segment. o Procedure to verify presence of any given Tenant VM or End-System within a given Overlay Segment at Overlay End-Point. Even though the present proposal addresses Overlay OAM for VXLAN, NVGRE, MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP, but the procedures described are generic enough to accommodate OAM for any other Overlay Technology.
- Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam… Kanwar Singh
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Shahram Davari
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)
- RE: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Sam Aldrin
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Anil Lohiya
- RE: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Shahram Davari
- RE: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… David Allan I
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… S. Davari
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Kanwar Singh
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Pradeep Jain
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… S. Davari
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Shahram Davari
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Anil Lohiya
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Sam Aldrin
- RE: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Gregory Mirsky
- RE: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Shahram Davari
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Sam Aldrin
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Shahram Davari
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Sam Aldrin
- RE: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Sam Aldrin
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- RE: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Pradeep Jain
- Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay… Thomas Nadeau