IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD

Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 25 October 2014 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4B11A1AAC; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9f9ABC9TnnO; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA01D1A1AA4; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rd3so2886185pab.27 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZKCqBetBkhnmKEynZtXxpQrFWaPFDWhKFvV0z/tkJqQ=; b=iuMWKW5m8cxP75WLM+l5ZNH/gaZpVzX3Y6d+ECuCExVeeL41qLDR5yExTWwN31+7Ns u9wL61U+B5btU2O22zGBYeR3V4d1t6s/Ex+TkaGVWFQ47LdC9SA5oCDRDDhIFSyGt0s1 B1DTPvAeuMwnxL475SnHYy4DAKrxmxRKcFs0Lu//LDX5uOmbeONj5t7w/hiNfyneHnh/ 9wYltEzQZ08pOu9meDmsbwMxV+dHCeK9AFEldwhliEz0IzKkvYIRmd9I40rUkpR3ODIq wm/u+XtmdkiuMv/nNwio/vcGSNpaZ4GhHODT5Zol8bMlCsGNb7UYyPriwhatLpmyFxBe VcHQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.243.36 with SMTP id wv4mr12358808pac.36.1414255609553; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-107-3-154-60.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [107.3.154.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uh2sm6578635pbc.86.2014.10.25.09.46.48 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
Subject: Re: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD
From: Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B7D26FBF2@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:46:47 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <114DCE0A-8384-4C82-9D17-44343744E417@gmail.com>
References: <EBF13062-39B3-4AC0-A18B-38AC4712BA70@gmail.com> <, > <B70C17E7-E718-4525-B2A6-0FB459237EBE@gmail.com> <, > <A0D3C3A4-7B58-402F-9E5B-64B86E0AC328@cisco.com> <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B7D26FBF2@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
To: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/KVXtoN4Dm54A6sWrxvM2QkHY7vA
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:46:56 -0000

The confusion was due to the mix up of IPR call related to the draft with the LC. Later on there was another email saying, the IPR call was issues wrongly.
Hence, couldn’t respond to the LC email.

-sam


> On Oct 25, 2014, at 5:28 AM, Shah, Himanshu <hshah@ciena.com> wrote:
> 
> Absolutely NOT!!!
> I am sorry I missed the call.
> Agree that attention has been diverted to newer
> Activities in ietf but that does not mean that work
> Items in the fading working group should be dropped.
> This is implemented and deployed solution.
> It is very important work and fills the gap that exist
> For static PW configurations. 
> 
> Please issue the last call again..
> 
> Thanks,
> Himanshu
> ________________________________________
> From: L2vpn [l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew McLachlan (amclachl) [amclachl@cisco.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 12:44 AM
> To: Giles Heron
> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org; pals@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD
> 
> That really should indicate its time to drop it.
> 
> 
> 
>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 18:26, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> And nobody responded :(
>> 
>> I'll discuss with the PALS chairs as to whether this is dropped, or is progressed in PALS.
>> 
>> Giles
>> 
>>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:20, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for:
>>> 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00
>>> 
>>> please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
>>> 
>>> this last call will close on Friday 24th October 2014.
>>> 
>>> Nabil & Giles
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email