RE: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt

["UTTARO, JAMES" <[e-mail]>]

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Haoweiguo [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 7:31 AM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy); [e-mail]; UTTARO, JAMES; '[e-mail]'.org'; '[e-mail]'
Cc: liuweihang
Subject: 答复: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt

Hi Jie and Stephane,
Flow-spec relies on BGP protocol to propagate ACL rules. L2VPN can be classified into EVPN and VPLS. VPLS can be further classified into three categories which are BGP VPLS, LDP VPLS, BGP AD +LDP VPLS.
In pure LDP VPLS scenario, no BGP protocol can be used for flow-spec,  i think ethernet flow-spec is hard to be deployed in this scenario. In all other scenarios, BGP flow-spec is easy to be incrementally deployed.
Thanks
weiguo
________________________________________
发件人: Dongjie (Jimmy)
发送时间: 2014年8月25日 17:53
收件人: [e-mail]; Haoweiguo; UTTARO, JAMES; '[e-mail]'.org'; '[e-mail]'
抄送: liuweihang
主题: RE: [Idr] New Version Notification for      draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt

Hi,

After reading this draft, I agree with Stephane that the new Flow Spec AFI/SAFI could be generalized for L2.

Regarding the application of FS to SDN, specific use cases may help to illustrate the benefits of using FS than using other tools.

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> [e-mail]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 4:23 PM
> To: Haoweiguo; UTTARO, JAMES; '[e-mail]'.org'; '[e-mail]'
> Cc: liuweihang
> Subject: Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for
> draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt
>
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a valuable addition, but I would like to see these MAC filters being
> applicable also to IPv4 plugs (FS IPv4 & VPNv4)
>
> Moreover , the new AFI/SAFI should not be restricted to EVPN, any L2 interface
> may be interested by such filter (VPLS, basic L2 switching ...).
>
> Route distinguisher may be is missing ...
>
> Now more globally, may be it's time to think more globally about the evolution
> of FS. I pretty see FS evolution largely beyond DDoS domain. FS is a very good
> protocol for SDN applications. The question behind is do we really need to work
> with multiple address families for each type of "service"/"interface type" to
> filter or do we need to have a more global model where we would be able to
> put any type of filter any where and apply multiple actions (openflow like FS).
> Compared to openflow, FS has the magic to enable multipoint distribution of
> actions.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Stephane
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Haoweiguo
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 04:11
> To: UTTARO, JAMES; '[e-mail]'.org'; '[e-mail]'
> Cc: liuweihang
> Subject: [Idr] 答复: New Version Notification for
> draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt
>
> Hi Jim,
> Thanks for your comments. The BGP Flowspec procedures is illustrated as
> following:
>
>                                           EVPN FlowSpec Session
> EVPN FlowSpec Session
> DDOS Detection Appliance--------------------------Egress
> PE-----------------------------Ingress PE------CE2
>
> |
>
> CE1 DDOS Detection Appliance establishes EVPN flowspec session with Egress
> PE, it detects DDOS attack traffic and generate ACL rule, the ACL rule is
> announced to Egress PE through EVPN flowspec protocol, then the egress PE
> announces it to ingress PE, finally ingress PE installs the ACL rule for traffic
> filtering.
> DDOS Detection Appliance only needs to support EVPN flowspec function, it
> doesn't need to support basic EVPN function.
> Thanks
> weiguo
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: UTTARO, JAMES [[e-mail]]
> 发送时间: 2014年8月21日 0:29
> 收件人: Haoweiguo; '[e-mail]'.org'; '[e-mail]'
> 抄送: liuweihang
> 主题: RE: New Version Notification for draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt
>
> Weiguo,
>
>         I would like to better understand how a remote PE will "learn" that it
> needs to deliver a FS path to the ingress PE?? It cannot come from the CE as
> that is data plane learning. I would think that all FS paths have to be
> disseminated by a centralized controller.
>
> Jim Uttaro
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Haoweiguo
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 8:31 PM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: liuweihang
> Subject: [Idr] 答复: New Version Notification for
> draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt
>
> Hi All,
> We have submitted a draft of " Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for
> EVPN".  I will appriciate if you can give us some suggestions and comments.
> Thanks
> weiguo
>
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: [e-mail] [[e-mail]]
> 发送时间: 2014年8月20日 8:20
> 收件人: Zhuangshunwan; Haoweiguo; liuweihang; Zhuangshunwan; liuweihang;
> Haoweiguo
> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Weiguo Hao and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Name:           draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn
> Revision:       00
> Title:          Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for EVPN
> Document date:  2014-08-20
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          7
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00.txt
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>    This document defines BGP flow-spec extension for Ethernet traffic
>    filtering in EVPN network. A new BGP NLRI type (AFI=25, SAFI=TBD)
>    value is proposed to identify EVPN flow-spec application. A new
>    subset of component types and extended community also are defined.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou
> copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le
> signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute
> responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used
> or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this
> message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr