IETF Logo Mail Archive

Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Fri, 23 May 2014 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=422023e6f2=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F571A01BA for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YL36FkpNe3xl for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AF91A0039 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s4NFxodN018959; Fri, 23 May 2014 12:01:27 -0400
Received: from vawvcgsie2k1301.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-35.ciena.com [63.118.36.35]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1m1sexattp-3 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 May 2014 12:01:27 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHHT03.ciena.com (10.128.6.43) by VAWVCGSIE2K1301.ciena.com (2.6.6.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Fri, 23 May 2014 12:01:05 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT03.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 23 May 2014 12:00:56 -0400
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:00:54 -0400
Subject: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03
Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03
Thread-Index: Ac92n0AAmd85MLEDQeuOSZTGWgDMvg==
Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-20712.000
x-tm-as-result: No--39.710600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948ONWVEXCHMB04cie_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.96, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-05-23_06:2014-05-23,2014-05-23,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1405230203
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/Pkps4Or1oL6ngZ8R4k6rK_OEfU0
Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" <msiva@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 16:01:35 -0000

WG -
We posted the following draft while back.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03

Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the same in PWE3 WG.
There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that MAC withdraw work
should reside in L2VPN WG.

Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider as a co-author.
There is a good interest in this work especially from those service providers who have
deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs.

Since there has been sufficient history to this document,  the authors request that this be
adopted as WG draft.

Thanks,
himanshu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email