IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: AD review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-inter-domain-redundancy

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 31 March 2014 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B68B1A07C2 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 05:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.783
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.783 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t22ySKQnEYAH for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 05:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC701A07B0 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 05:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2VCJJ83024476; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:19:19 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (13.17.90.92.rev.sfr.net [92.90.17.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2VCJGhl024414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:19:18 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Loa Andersson'" <loa@pi.nu>, "'Lizhong Jin'" <lizho.jin@gmail.com>, <draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-inter-domain-redundancy.all@tools.ietf.org>
References: <0aaa01cf45f0$7d04ae00$770e0a00$@olddog.co.uk> <53345952.a70e440a.2a29.4f84@mx.google.com> <016601cf4c50$078c8ce0$16a5a6a0$@olddog.co.uk> <53393028.3040602@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <53393028.3040602@pi.nu>
Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-inter-domain-redundancy
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:19:18 +0100
Message-ID: <00d101cf4cdb$71b99410$552cbc30$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKieMH6bvwQq0oDr/K5WljRkwwysgG2FEXSAieGbsoB3Axjp5km9s9Q
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1017-20600.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--14.467-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--14.467-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: eP8acdNseTlDZFBd1jLr/vHkpkyUphL9Za7LkubQvj8Y0A95tjAn+/dO IHrYOwAQpXW4iKpJiG0cMKF+qCRP0lmCvWO6jvPwMIiU395I8H00AKed0u9fB0UNHQAoZf5cmCs m0zDyYj7RFPQDdklzg3p6Bw0EVM2R088R7Ofw5yfpnOP6QxEGtn0tCKdnhB58O5QxsrU10s/6C0 ePs7A07Y6HM5rqDwqtRkErup0rUN7hjV6OJz3xcDWT7IkqByCo6fq43GLsQMu2f8Xmimxl/A==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/VE-O4dbcuxaGUe-AG2fpm60S2Js
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:19:27 -0000

Hi Loa,

> >> >[Lizhong] thank you for pointing out this. We will change to Standards Track.
> >
> > Good. I hope the WG is paying attention!
> 
> As part of the working group I find that what you say above it not
> entirely clear.
> 
> I can think of two things:
> 
> 1. It will have an effect on the Shepherd Write-up, I guess that Giles
>     can take care of that.
> 
> 2. I also think that changing a draft from BCP to PS would need to
>     confirmed by the working group. I support this change but I guess a
>     short wglc would be in place.

Good, you see, you were paying attention.

Shepherd write-up is something between me and the shepherd, we can take care of that.

Change of status from BCP to Standards track is something the WG has to be happy with. The WG chairs are the people who assess whether the WG is happy. They can use any tool they like.

Cheers,
Adrian

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email