IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft "Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN", draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02

"UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com> Mon, 06 October 2014 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ju1738@att.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500B61A6FC1 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.472
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3p5292DX4UfD for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09EF1A01A9 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) with ESMTP id deda2345.2ba9fe00f940.29726.00-2493.85711.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <ju1738@att.com>); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5432aded6322b6a3-35bc0362c789342bb85799f4dca09944d3cd95d7
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 4eda2345.0.29641.00-2323.85453.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <ju1738@att.com>); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5432ade57852c5b9-30ac484f9d65393643147566533f533d59df0fd6
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s96EvdGf011686; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:57:40 -0400
Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s96EvV9P011460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:57:35 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.148]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:57:17 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.28]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:57:16 -0400
From: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
To: "'Henderickx, Wim (Wim)'" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>, "'Bitar, Nabil N'" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>, "'l2vpn@ietf.org'" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft "Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN", draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02
Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft "Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN", draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02
Thread-Index: AQHP4WixzukGBifnM0654a9YQGeFfZwjaaCA//+/+fA=
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:57:16 +0000
Message-ID: <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F06D9122A@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <DFEE5C63-7ED6-4DEE-AA2D-2082E711C085@gmail.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F356@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F359@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F35B@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <D058784C.FB341%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <D058784C.FB341%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.91.76.199]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=YZoKEXtf c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=KGJm5UBqB4oA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJ]
X-AnalysisOut: [EP1OIZ-IA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUA]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAA:8 a=ZsyXEVtvAAAA:8 a=j9JRHT4rvcXAVjjyLnwA:9 a=wPNLvfGT]
X-AnalysisOut: [eEIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=TRFw3Wk1wdAA:10]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <ju1738@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/VYdyuNjv5DJ7sq8DJEJn-ys5zow
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:57:51 -0000

+1.

-----Original Message-----
From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 10:49 AM
To: Bitar, Nabil N; l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft "Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN", draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02

Support for WG adoption. This draft was written on request of the group to
describe the options on how to use EPN and clarify the base draft.

On 06/10/14 15:20, "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com> wrote:

>L2VPN WG,
>
>This is the start of a 2-week call for adopting the draft ³Usage and
>applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN²,
>draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02, as an L2VPN WG document.  The draft can be
>found at: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02.txt.
>
>This draft was well supported in the WG meeting in Toronto, but as always
>we are taking it to the list to decide on WG adoption. Please, reply to
>this email indicating your support or objection to adopting this draft as
>a WG document. Substantive comments in addition to indicating your
>support or objection are appreciated.
>
>This call will close on Monday, October 20, 2014.
>
>Thanks,
>Nabil & Giles
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email