Re: IPLS
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Mon, 14 July 2014 13:07 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47801A03DC for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id frDdpob7c2Mh for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B857D1A03DB for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.130] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59DB01802B19; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:07:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53C3D61A.2090102@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:07:38 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPLS
References: <7D0D3E1D-294E-4A85-AA1D-A86A5F5C0E5F@gmail.com> <de97d3d3c89241bf90769f13dac39772@AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <EBA5134E-6361-4CFD-A26A-FFBA43DB898C@gmail.com> <c634f9d1ca9e4bdca4ffd19f3f60a25f@AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <c634f9d1ca9e4bdca4ffd19f3f60a25f@AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/W5mIdBH8FbNAhqQGCbEN6sY0of4
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:07:37 -0000
Sasha, hmmm - the MPLS wg pubished RFC 6348, that is a requirement document, so in itself it has not been implemented or deployed; even if you can problably make the argument that specification fulfilling the requirements has. I think that making a document is because we want it to available in the future. /Loa On 2014-07-14 14:27, Alexander Vainshtein wrote: > Hi Giles, > Lots of thanks for a prompt response. > > I have always thought that Historic RFCs describe something that has been implemented and deployed, but new standards are now in force. > E.g., original Martini drafts (which definitely have been implemented and deployed) have been published as Historic RFCs. > > For the sake of curiosity, is this the case with IPLS? > > Regards, > Sasha > Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com > Mobile: 054-9266302 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Giles Heron [mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:10 PM >> To: Alexander Vainshtein >> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: IPLS >> >> Hi Sasha, >> >> yes - I believe that's the plan. >> >> Giles >> >> On 14 Jul 2014, at 13:09, Alexander Vainshtein >> <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> wrote: >> >>> Giles, >>> Do you intend to progress it directly to Historic RFC? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Sasha >>> Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com >>> Mobile: 054-9266302 >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron >>>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:08 PM >>>> To: l2vpn@ietf.org >>>> Subject: IPLS >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> the IPLS draft (probably the oldest draft ever to attempt to progress >>>> to RFC) was recently re-published as "historic" rather than >> "informational": >>>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-14 >>>> >>>> To that end the IANA assignments requested in the draft were also >>>> withdrawn - though they could be re-instated if the draft were ever >>>> to progress. >>>> >>>> Based on these changes we now intend to progress this draft to RFC. >>>> >>>> Giles >>>> >>> > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64