Re: What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sat, 10 May 2014 13:18 UTC
Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322CC1A0248
for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 May 2014 06:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id tVruZlP7FR9p for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 10 May 2014 06:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22f.google.com (mail-qa0-x22f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22f])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA461A0247
for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 May 2014 06:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s7so5223840qap.20
for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 May 2014 06:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=Va9UBmc9U7iGVmayL7tGnzJnfuHJiB+tGRDs6XSUscc=;
b=VxS+pt3fPnb/2nDy38poFtzDkm+MJS+/Lj6LQdj56vHGyEcXXHmjRpBtz9MN7yJWiW
hmsSwXhndrfEZafOHPO4wpAxBsi2jvuJI3XLge/A7YrPN0LTOaXGXxR4BsYkGQfprQ9J
EXjXBcGHuJYd0t/ncAlqqu4uv3VmCBoM6v8Ejq/r9EMcBkuEaH7TO1oPDEBY4aq4Ir14
594dSsWxY1ppWtdzobSdUa5tnuM1t8mlkpgTPDz8ALWkYZmZNZ5O8zQbP84cxictQagZ
rvzVhZ4kSDfYyROC2aDcoZDM2a1IOrnZSh4PRBX4Lugch/58qs7PBBxSM6B0zT/wOsyx
hv6Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.37.135 with SMTP id r7mr21901115qgr.61.1399727907063;
Sat, 10 May 2014 06:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.80.100 with HTTP; Sat, 10 May 2014 06:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <536DFB7F.3080601@pi.nu>
References: <B036E21A-3AF1-4073-B1B3-7FFAF0430932@gmail.com>
<CF9295F7.1FC87%pbrisset@cisco.com> <536DFB7F.3080601@pi.nu>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 09:18:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1i94FiCJ6mFEvim-nW2+HAxYG+sAxzPJDC_cTkbiYCCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c146d0aecc5804f90b8c32
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/XwKNoyN-oRR7vrlXkuMF93pV6hs
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 13:18:34 -0000
I agree with Loa's assessment of the document. Cheers, Andy On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote: > Folks, > > We have had two mails responding "+1" to the start of a working > group last call. What does this mean, are this mails to tell us > that it is really time to start a wglc? > > A personal reflection would be that one should avoid "+1" since > it does help, say what you mean instead. > > BTW, this is a well-written and well-structured document, that > with the exception for two dated references seems to be ready > to send to the IESG with a request for publication. > > > /Loa > > On 2014-05-09 20:26, Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 2014-05-09, 9:01 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 >>> >>> please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for >>> publication as a Standards Track RFC from the L2VPN WG. >>> >>> this last call will close on Friday 23rd May 2014. >>> >>> Nabil & Giles >>> >> >> > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > >
- WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Giles Heron
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 John E Drake
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Yakov Rekhter
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Jeff Tantsura
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Ronald Bonica
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 UTTARO, JAMES
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 William Zayas
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Gregory Mirsky
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2… Loa Andersson
- Re: What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-iet… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Xialiang (Frank)
- 答复: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Lizhenbin
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Luay Jalil
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Duwenhua
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Mingui Zhang
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 chen.ran
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Giles Heron