RE: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04

["Dennis Cai (dcai)" <[e-mail]>]

I am not aware of any IPR associated with this draft.

-----Original Message-----
From: L2vpn [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:33 AM
To: Thomas Morin; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04

Hi Thomas,

I'm not aware of any IPR related to that draft.


Regards,

Patrice

   Patrice Brissette
TECHNICAL LEADER.ENGINEERING

[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

Cisco Systems Canada Co. / Les Systemes Cisco Canada CIE Canada Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/global/CA/>

 Think before you print.This
 email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use  of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
Please click here
<http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for Company Registration Information.






On 2014-12-18, 9:19 AM, "Thomas Morin" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>Before formally adopting this in BESS, we need an answer from each
>co-author on this recurrent reminder question about existing knowledge
>of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been
>disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Best,
>
>-Thomas/Martin
>
>
>Nabil:
>> Hi,
>> For the record, this call had closed on October 20. The draft has good
>> support. The authors are to work with the BESS WG chairs to issue this
>>draft as a BESS working group draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nabil & Giles
>> _____________________________
>> From: Bitar, Nabil
>> N
>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:16 AM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Cc: Giles Heron;
>> [e-mail]
>> Subject: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS
>> support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04
>>
>> L2VPN WG,
>>
>> This is the
>> start of a 2-week call for adopting the draft ³VPWS support in E-VPN²,
>> draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04, as an L2VPN WG document. The draft
>>can be
>> found at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04.txt
>>
>> This
>> draft was well supported in the WG meeting in Toronto, but as always we
>>are
>> taking it to the list to decide on WG adoption. Please, reply to this
>>email
>> indicating your support or objection to adopting this draft as a WG
>> document. Substantive comments in addition to indicating your support or
>> objection are appreciated
>>
>> This call will close on Monday, October 20,
>> 2014.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nabil & Giles
>>
>>
>>
>