What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 10 May 2014 10:12 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1841A0210
for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 May 2014 03:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id CK2IUEJk1de3 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 10 May 2014 03:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E653D1A020E
for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 May 2014 03:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (unknown [112.208.54.72])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu)
by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 394411802AD1;
Sat, 10 May 2014 12:12:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <536DFB7F.3080601@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:12:15 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <pbrisset@cisco.com>,
satyamoh@cisco.com
Subject: What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
References: <B036E21A-3AF1-4073-B1B3-7FFAF0430932@gmail.com>
<CF9295F7.1FC87%pbrisset@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF9295F7.1FC87%pbrisset@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/b2ufnWVWRZSz8kaXC2isPLAvmwA
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 10:12:27 -0000
Folks, We have had two mails responding "+1" to the start of a working group last call. What does this mean, are this mails to tell us that it is really time to start a wglc? A personal reflection would be that one should avoid "+1" since it does help, say what you mean instead. BTW, this is a well-written and well-structured document, that with the exception for two dated references seems to be ready to send to the IESG with a request for publication. /Loa On 2014-05-09 20:26, Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) wrote: > +1 > > On 2014-05-09, 9:01 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 >> >> please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for >> publication as a Standards Track RFC from the L2VPN WG. >> >> this last call will close on Friday 23rd May 2014. >> >> Nabil & Giles > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Giles Heron
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 John E Drake
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Yakov Rekhter
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Jeff Tantsura
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Ronald Bonica
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 UTTARO, JAMES
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 William Zayas
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Gregory Mirsky
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2… Loa Andersson
- Re: What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-iet… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Xialiang (Frank)
- 答复: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Lizhenbin
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Luay Jalil
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Duwenhua
- RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Mingui Zhang
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 chen.ran
- Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 Giles Heron