What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 10 May 2014 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1841A0210 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 May 2014 03:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CK2IUEJk1de3 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 May 2014 03:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E653D1A020E for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 May 2014 03:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (unknown [112.208.54.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 394411802AD1; Sat, 10 May 2014 12:12:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <536DFB7F.3080601@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:12:15 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <pbrisset@cisco.com>, satyamoh@cisco.com
Subject: What does "+1" mean - Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
References: <B036E21A-3AF1-4073-B1B3-7FFAF0430932@gmail.com> <CF9295F7.1FC87%pbrisset@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF9295F7.1FC87%pbrisset@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/b2ufnWVWRZSz8kaXC2isPLAvmwA
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 10:12:27 -0000

Folks,

We have had two mails responding "+1" to the start of a working
group last call. What does this mean, are this mails to tell us
that it is really time to start a wglc?

A personal reflection would be that one should avoid "+1" since
it does help, say what you mean instead.

BTW, this is a well-written and well-structured document, that
with the exception for two dated references seems to be ready
to send to the IESG with a request for publication.


/Loa

On 2014-05-09 20:26, Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2014-05-09, 9:01 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07
>>
>> please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for
>> publication as a Standards Track RFC from the L2VPN WG.
>>
>> this last call will close on Friday 23rd May 2014.
>>
>> Nabil & Giles
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64