seeking information on draft-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 19 August 2014 19:01 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14591A6FCF
for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.646
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Cvzh3xMhPC_3 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com
[64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEAD1A88D9
for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS))
x-ip-name=50.79.160.246;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: seeking information on
draft-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:00:58 -0400
Message-ID: <00ac01cfbbdf$e9a1f440$bce5dcc0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AD_01CFBBBE.6290F080"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: Ac+735DGL/F4J7ALQ5eQWNtJsOMlqg==
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/if-GdoNGzByP8xZwZ6n6ufdq6C8
Cc: "Ali Sajassi \(sajassi\)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>,
<mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:01:34 -0000
Hi all: The draft-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-04.txt proposes a tunnel attribute which is similar to draft-vandevelde-idr-remote-next-hop-07 (which is up for WG Adoption in IDR). Can you tell me why we have two proposed BGP attributes for tunnels with a high overlap? My first impression is that "great minds" think align to solve different problems using BGP, but had not chatted with each other to collaborate. Is this reason the drafts are alike? Sue Hares
- seeking information on draft-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-i… Susan Hares
- Re: seeking information on draft-sajassi-l2vpn-ev… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)