Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft "Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN", draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02

Stefan Plug <Stefan.Plug@os3.nl> Wed, 15 October 2014 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Stefan.Plug@os3.nl>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DAD1A8A49 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2gt48Wev6d_N for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.serv.os3.nl (mail.serv.os3.nl [IPv6:2001:610:158:960::25]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E411A8A42 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.os3.nl (smtp.os3.nl [145.100.96.119]) by mail.serv.os3.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCAF17B4B8; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:56:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:1a8:102:b0e3:fe43:a125:80d8] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1a8:102:b0e3:fe43:a125:80d8]) by smtp.os3.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19E7F17B4B7; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:56:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <543EA72F.4050702@os3.nl>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:56:15 +0200
From: Stefan Plug <Stefan.Plug@os3.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" <jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft "Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN", draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02
References: <DFEE5C63-7ED6-4DEE-AA2D-2082E711C085@gmail.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F356@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F359@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F35B@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <543D8F6C.6070001@os3.nl> <D063257A.553A9%jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <D063257A.553A9%jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/igb0vvf6aQLSSZVHTPvFLMMJGJg
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:56:21 -0000

Hi Jorge,

Thank you. I support this new version.

Cheers,

Stefan

On 15-10-14 04:14, Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge) wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> We have just uploaded rev 03 where you can see the terminology changed.
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-03
> 
> 
> Please let us know if you support this document now for WG adoption.
> Thank you.
> Jorge
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Plug <Stefan.Plug@os3.nl>
> Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM
> To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft "Usage and
> applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN", draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02
> 
>> I believe this draft still uses the terms 'packet' and 'frame' quite
>> indiscriminately.
>>
>> Again as an example
>> 'The MPLS-encapsulated packet' on page 13 point e) which indicates that
>> only the packet i.e. L3 is encapsulated (which would remove the L2
>> information needed).
>>
>> In reality the entire frame is encapsulated as is indeed stated on page
>> 26:
>> "PE1 will push the MPLS Label(s) onto the original Ethernet frame and
>> send the packet to the MPLS network"
>>
>> On 09-07-14 16:43, Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge) wrote:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> We will make sure draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage has the right wording (frame
>>> vs packet) in the next revision.
>>> Thank you for the feedback.
>>>
>>> Jorge
>>
>> I would like to see the terminology changed to avoid confusion and
>> therefore must object for now.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>> On 06-10-14 15:20, Bitar, Nabil N wrote:
>>> L2VPN WG,
>>>
>>> This is the start of a 2-week call for adopting the draft “Usage and
>>> applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN”,
>>> draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02, as an L2VPN WG document.  The draft can be
>>> found at: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage-02.txt.
>>>
>>> This draft was well supported in the WG meeting in Toronto, but as
>>> always we are taking it to the list to decide on WG adoption. Please,
>>> reply to this email indicating your support or objection to adopting
>>> this draft as a WG document. Substantive comments in addition to
>>> indicating your support or objection are appreciated.
>>>
>>> This call will close on Monday, October 20, 2014.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nabil & Giles
>>>
>>
>