Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 27 February 2014 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634311A0323 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:27:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQvfkhuRdofT for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BAF1A0033 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ks9so2679460vcb.39 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:27:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JLwRxLUlzKr83DdWAdz5thTsgCQWB5mi1aT9daAVpos=; b=EJsNvR17eOHEkdsu86YqW+eSj8gv4KH/5yqWqLxakE+V/ljiieLAGVxlmT9u5OTsKV njxlMl6rW/WwnylGkPG1kS45QD6fz9b8uKp34nu6IDSul3K+MbSFoY72i0VeFyYRI7x2 91F2hvQ1I/7GipqBpSW366tH48Tw89v1o9OswLqi2+A6FPZ1GDvM3og+pxHmBWwgsaNZ lY8GWWDQCAfhZvst0Hw5aHyyKaFr+HxmhV5ayAjfmy4NKC8EfXU+C6K237H06ZR3CpIt MMZziwngoPyvcFwcGl+6qGAXRQ44hmxV/Z25XJhmble6El7/RYLtgJxo6C8ic1N9LZXU xfoQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.188.70 with SMTP id cz6mr99617vcb.59.1393518423184; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:27:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.129.207 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:27:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPCgso32vYqPEq4upa1FG78quZwBOJpzsCSCYTX2R7XgHzLiNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPCgso32vYqPEq4upa1FG78quZwBOJpzsCSCYTX2R7XgHzLiNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:27:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWr6oa-eVY5+7ydGNxeFSRWze+QpC3Si+vVjaC=3yciXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
To: Kanwar Singh <kanwar@nuagenetworks.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012951269a1b8f04f365ca0f
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/jOYmzX6vXCg3rIFN2n7JXS3nvV8
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>, Pradeep Jain <pradeep@nuagenetworks.net>, Vinay Bannai <vbannai@paypal.com>, Ravi Shekhar <rshekhar@juniper.net>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:27:07 -0000

Hi Kanwar, et. al,
the document is certainly interesting and very detailed. But I believe that
it is rather too early to discuss applicability of particular OAM tools
without agreed upon set of requirements for NVO3 OAM and comprehensive gap
analysis.

Regards,
Greg


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Kanwar Singh <kanwar@nuagenetworks.net>wrote;wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> We have submitted the below draft that proposes Generic OAM and Datapath
> Failure Detection Mechanism(s) for Overlay Networks.
>
> We would like to solicit inputs from the members of L2VPN WG.
>
> Please review the same and update us with your inputs/feedback.
>
> Warm Regards
>
> - Kanwar
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Kanwar Singh and posted to the
>
> IETF repository.
>
>
> Name:           draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam
> Revision:       01
> Title:          Generic Overlay OAM and Datapath Failure Detection
>
> Document date:  2014-02-12
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          44
> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
>
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam/
>
> Htmlized:      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01
>
> Diff:              http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01
>
>
> Abstract:
>
>    This proposal describes a mechanism that can be used to detect Data
>
>    Path Failures of various overlay technologies as VXLAN, NVGRE,
>
>    MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP and verifying/sanity of their Control and Data
>
>    Plane for given Overlay Segment.  This document defines the following
>
>    for each of the above Overlay Technologies:
>
>    o  Encapsulation of OAM Packet, such that it has same Outer and
>
>       Overlay Header as any End-System's data going over the same
>
>       Overlay Segment.
>
>    o  The mechanism to trace the Underlay that is exercised by any
>
>       Overlay Segment.
>
>    o  Procedure to verify presence of any given Tenant VM or End-System
>
>       within a given Overlay Segment at Overlay End-Point.
>
>    Even though the present proposal addresses Overlay OAM for VXLAN,
>
>    NVGRE, MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP, but the procedures described are
>
>    generic enough to accommodate OAM for any other Overlay Technology.
>
>