Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04

"Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <pbrisset@cisco.com> Fri, 19 December 2014 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pbrisset@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036181A00D8 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:32:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DOT0dOog6nbV for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 514E31A88C5 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:32:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4102; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1418999566; x=1420209166; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=95yadi1VwGtu1TzLaCbpI4w1nh0C7pYABxBqTV3Q8Pc=; b=FNgVKvkkv8HTycqvmT7516Hpvxh41TrckifgR8Wwl7z7dXi1VPD4TyKu M7b+jVyormWncS0OpZUJn5g4fq/lD5k/DsOJ4bomYp6te8Hmt0MvSkjmx ecUi5/mMpO5W9K0HBztPj9f7/QqOwVH0KkyWL/0cek1S1skgkqhbdfX3v E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoIAM01lFStJV2T/2dsb2JhbABXA4MGUlgEgwHAe4IlhXECHH8WAQEBAQF9hAwBAQEEHRcyIQICAQgRBAEBBSgCAhkXHQgCBAESCYgjDZ0WnGAGgUyUXgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGASBF411EQEdDQsLFwYLglGBRwWODIM+hTKBDTCCMooggzkiggYWFIE8bwGBBAcXIn4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,606,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="106931884"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2014 14:32:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBJEWj5B011207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:32:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.4.27]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:32:45 -0600
From: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <pbrisset@cisco.com>
To: Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>, "draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws@tools.ietf.org" <draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04
Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04
Thread-Index: AQHQG5inE0xFN9MJrkCl+aOqddL0bQ==
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:32:44 +0000
Message-ID: <D0B9A118.42BEC%pbrisset@cisco.com>
References: <DFEE5C63-7ED6-4DEE-AA2D-2082E711C085@gmail.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F356@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA124555F359@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA12486DC1E5@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com> <5492E264.7080001@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <5492E264.7080001@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.144]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr"
Content-ID: <9C1B6E2A7B7CF84BAEB9C711C36935DD@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/kM_3j_6iX3BFwBIzuHyChtXvjSw
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:32:50 -0000

Hi Thomas,

I’m not aware of any IPR related to that draft.


Regards,

Patrice

   Patrice Brissette
TECHNICAL LEADER.ENGINEERING

pbrisset@cisco.com
Phone: +1 613 254 3336

Cisco Systems Canada Co. / Les Systemes Cisco Canada CIE
Canada
Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/global/CA/>

 Think before you print.This
 email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
Please click here 
<http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for
Company Registration Information.






On 2014-12-18, 9:19 AM, "Thomas Morin" <thomas.morin@orange.com>; wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>Before formally adopting this in BESS, we need an answer from each
>co-author on this recurrent reminder question about existing knowledge
>of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been
>disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Best,
>
>-Thomas/Martin
>
>
>Nabil:
>> Hi,
>> For the record, this call had closed on October 20. The draft has good
>> support. The authors are to work with the BESS WG chairs to issue this
>>draft as a BESS working group draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nabil & Giles
>> _____________________________
>> From: Bitar, Nabil
>> N
>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:16 AM
>> To: l2vpn@ietf.org
>> Cc: Giles Heron;
>> amclachl@cisco.com
>> Subject: [l2vpn] WG adoption call for the draft VPWS
>> support in E-VPN, draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04
>>
>> L2VPN WG,
>>
>> This is the
>> start of a 2-week call for adopting the draft ³VPWS support in E-VPN²,
>> draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04, as an L2VPN WG document. The draft
>>can be
>> found at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04.txt
>>
>> This
>> draft was well supported in the WG meeting in Toronto, but as always we
>>are
>> taking it to the list to decide on WG adoption. Please, reply to this
>>email
>> indicating your support or objection to adopting this draft as a WG
>> document. Substantive comments in addition to indicating your support or
>> objection are appreciated
>>
>> This call will close on Monday, October 20,
>> 2014.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nabil & Giles
>>
>>
>>
>