Re: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Sat, 25 October 2014 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAFB1A037A; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6n5rZTvfbAS; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0766.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::766]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4921A0363; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DB4PR03MB395.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.231.16) by DB4PR03MB393.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.231.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1049.19; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:14:05 +0000
Received: from DB4PR03MB395.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.231.16]) by DB4PR03MB395.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.231.16]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:14:04 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>, "Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" <amclachl@cisco.com>, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD
Thread-Topic: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD
Thread-Index: AQHP8G6yvGC9Ummmmkekn7QYX29Qrw==
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:14:04 +0000
Message-ID: <103efa66397a44b4b0614606744c5dab@DB4PR03MB395.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Infraware POLARIS Mobile Mailer v2.5
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [109.253.146.90]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR03MB393;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0375972289
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(51704005)(479174003)(377454003)(189002)(24454002)(164054003)(199003)(105586002)(106356001)(86362001)(97736003)(66066001)(120916001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(4396001)(122556002)(50226001)(15975445006)(106116001)(108616004)(76482002)(62966002)(16236675004)(64706001)(15202345003)(107046002)(77156001)(31966008)(89996001)(2656002)(40100003)(88136002)(99396003)(104166001)(21056001)(85306004)(93916002)(19625215002)(87936001)(74316001)(80022003)(19617315012)(20776003)(101416001)(92566001)(76576001)(50986999)(33646002)(87286001)(85852003)(46102003)(95666004)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR03MB393; H:DB4PR03MB395.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_103efa66397a44b4b0614606744c5dabDB4PR03MB395eurprd03pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/mf3whaPP9wTRoKJKyziUzAR2JHs
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>, Rotem Cohen <Rotem.Cohen@ecitele.com>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:21:21 -0000

I concur with Himanshu.

This is an important draft and IMO dropping it would be a mistake.



I will provide specifiv comments soon.



Thumb typed on my LG,
Sasha

------ Original message ------
From: Shah, Himanshu
Date: 25/10/2014 15:33
To: Andrew McLachlan (amclachl);Giles Heron;
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org;pals@ietf.org;
Subject:RE: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD

Absolutely NOT!!!
I am sorry I missed the call.
Agree that attention has been diverted to newer
Activities in ietf but that does not mean that work
Items in the fading working group should be dropped.
This is implemented and deployed solution.
It is very important work and fills the gap that exist
For static PW configurations.

Please issue the last call again..

Thanks,
Himanshu
________________________________________
From: L2vpn [l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew McLachlan (amclachl) [amclachl@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 12:44 AM
To: Giles Heron
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org; pals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: L2VPN WG LC for MPLS-TP MAC-WD

That really should indicate its time to drop it.



> On 24 Oct 2014, at 18:26, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And nobody responded :(
>
> I'll discuss with the PALS chairs as to whether this is dropped, or is progressed in PALS.
>
> Giles
>
>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:20, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00
>>
>> please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
>>
>> this last call will close on Friday 24th October 2014.
>>
>> Nabil & Giles
>