IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650491B2DE8 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 06:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FfRZsgQOwQaG for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 06:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoemail2.alcatel.com (hoemail2.alcatel.com [192.160.6.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B5F61B2BDD for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 06:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by hoemail2.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s6LDMHFN027696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:22:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s6LDMG9d021940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:22:17 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.52]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:22:17 +0200
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07
Thread-Topic: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07
Thread-Index: AQHPmdnn2ANr5NAeVkyaE1Ic9UmRbpuVY86AgBSKcYD//+Z3gIAAheWA///apYA=
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:22:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CFF28C2D.E1FC1%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <6BEB6C94-94F8-416D-840F-E010FBD97F6B@gmail.com> <049F714F-F855-414B-936E-B66EEBB42537@cisco.com> <623637051A3DC34E80FC9BA35B4629951CF9BBBB@xmb-rcd-x05.cisco.com> <CFF23B22.E1E3B%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> <8D250AA2-EDC6-4E2E-BD7A-9097556AD971@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D250AA2-EDC6-4E2E-BD7A-9097556AD971@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <84AC2EEEF91570459B71C1A9615F48A2@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/n4oHvO8xHuYBTsL6dPymRdo9KaM
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:23:38 -0000

I would support progressing them as well.

On 21/07/14 07:35, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:

>thanks all,
>
>while more comments might have been nice I think we've got enough
>consensus to pass this to IESG so I'll get onto that.
>
>we now come on to the tricky question of TRILL EVPN and SPBM EVPN, and
>whether there's still interest in progressing those.  Perhaps something
>to discuss today?
>
>Giles
>
>On 21 Jul 2014, at 08:36, Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
><wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>
>> Same for me support as co-author. The document is stable for a while.
>> 
>> On 21/07/14 01:07, "Dennis Cai (dcai)" <dcai@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Support publication!
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Samer Salam
>>> (ssalam)
>>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 8:27 PM
>>> To: Giles Heron
>>> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07
>>> 
>>> This draft has undergone multiple discussions, and workgroup review
>>> comments were incorporated.  Support publication, as coauthor.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Samer
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 4:52 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for:
>>>> 
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07
>>>> 
>>>> please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for
>>>> publication as a Standards Track RFC from the L2VPN WG.
>>>> 
>>>> this last call will close on Monday 21st July 2014.
>>>> 
>>>> Nabil & Giles
>>> 
>> 
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email