Re: WG adoption call for EVPN Overlay draft

"Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com> Fri, 03 October 2014 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ssalam@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8504E1A037E for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WBJCX5eKCMWs for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454D91A0123 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=722; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1412353161; x=1413562761; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=dNjNhsRHlv2tydv8kSKWlVnE123/Ah1nRyLFC8nJK+4=; b=i4yhAGRfziGRdc8pZ9iXAJouKBtKSlzgUlKBiQZx/kOIkBsVXnOvLV+f H4KzugrVeksDugI4BFfCtU7IOB/JTQlLaHpQUgILnLWIdz2n1VJLXgRce kxiWswfncuWT6hSK9hHykZOC7HK8X6gc5XZw3jFkUgkWJMPctefIJg9lD c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0FADbMLlStJV2S/2dsb2JhbABggmsjU1gEyn+HTQKBDRYBe4QEAgQdHVEBCDYxESUCBAESiCoDEQEMuDENhwIYjX2BTxEBV4RLBY84IoIahDyEfYIRgWiNR4ZRg2NsgQ85gQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,648,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="360480148"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2014 16:19:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93GJJ1k023950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 16:19:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:19:19 -0500
From: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption call for EVPN Overlay draft
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for EVPN Overlay draft
Thread-Index: AQHP3weE+mP7SProLkKBZt/9Jqfrhpwea/kA
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:19:19 +0000
Message-ID: <D0541A8D.3DCEB%ssalam@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DFEE5C63-7ED6-4DEE-AA2D-2082E711C085@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206
x-originating-ip: [161.44.210.102]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <090BB0389CBFEA4FB2BBE9FC79159D7F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/nnK-gjZoVrSnnQP7AHFittW4Eqw
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:19:21 -0000

Support.

Regards,
Samer

On 2014-10-03 5:42 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi WG,
>
>this email initiates a WG adoption call for:
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03
>
>the draft was well supported at the WG meeting in Toronto, but for the
>sake of record do feel free to send the usual flood of "Support!" emails
>(if nothing else to make the doc shepherd's job easier).  Of course it
>would be even more helpful if people could send substantive comments as
>to the suitability (or not) of this draft for adoption by the L2VPN WG so
>the authors/chairs actually have some feedback to work with.
>
>this poll will close on Friday October 17th.
>
>Giles