Re: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 (etree framework) - extended. Please, provide comments, and indicate objection or support for moving this draft forward

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 10 February 2014 06:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0FE1A0798 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 22:03:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9lPzRYib2e5 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 22:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoemail2.alcatel.com (hoemail2.alcatel.com [192.160.6.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363C51A04C6 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 22:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by hoemail2.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s1A63gMk022987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:03:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s1A63fuA001860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:03:41 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.30]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:03:41 +0100
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 (etree framework) - extended. Please, provide comments, and indicate objection or support for moving this draft forward
Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 (etree framework) - extended. Please, provide comments, and indicate objection or support for moving this draft forward
Thread-Index: AQHPJeW6QRCH2EZWg0ChrZwysR2dEJqt/+OA
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:03:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CF1E2A48.AB445%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA11DB004674@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA11DB004674@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5124C77DFD6D2B4C939D17525A67F411@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:03:47 -0000

support

On 09/02/14 23:24, "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>This is an extension of the working group last call on the draft "A
>Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multiprotocol Label
>Switching (MPLS) Network".  The draft can be found at
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04.
>
>There was no response to an earlier call, and we want to ensure that
>people are paying attention. There were quite few edits from the earlier
>draft version.
>
>Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group
>email list by responding to this email. Please, indicate your support for
>moving this draft forward or any objection you might have.
>
>This extended WG last call will close on Monday February 17, 2014.
>
>Regards,
>Nabil & Giles