IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07

Paul Unbehagen <paul@unbehagen.net> Mon, 21 July 2014 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@unbehagen.net>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510A11A002D for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQ7i7Sg8BpYG for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC211A0175 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id et14so10143729pad.21 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=4Q05wqWIu5zZpZ3toDvEA8JDdARuR4ckHwvR8ayRRyQ=; b=HoM+Lo8fA98dUR/PoeP5yymS8zqO1xQrqo2wx/iykqeuidyv7PbHfIYNoqVEcaEchE 7Agtq7edPpPX10OxeVcQntcp+qHkZpVd91+eM/XbEAuY9yyKqWXRwh9PdGRJ4VLvC783 cX0rzsil7pB9dNDf8CMBdAOcza03OyMnGbEjyesTC40GqMOTjpgj17xLa+UbjdodbPGd DTQImWLamumCR9GN6n961jji6/ySg6VL+yb7MxEeO8BIu/aQY2xa8AWpR0OaNuJ/7qhB GYAb3GABSMnqydGXq7xvvU42+GOvy8Z8rkCOrGJgXlN4PtEeZArABWAfoYnaDLjxqoQu V6cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWLIwEVyOIlMpJXVhb3y7S1ZgE1W7WIevlncj6yxqNTcFtouh/r0rzFGYY+tEmzjR+ol1f
X-Received: by 10.67.30.130 with SMTP id ke2mr27174870pad.44.1405966435567; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.6.43.16] ([166.170.40.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cm7sm19984004pdb.74.2014.07.21.11.13.52 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07
From: Paul Unbehagen <paul@unbehagen.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D257)
In-Reply-To: <CFF28C2D.E1FC1%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:13:51 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9AB2CD2B-83E9-42B1-9FD3-8DB40E187544@unbehagen.net>
References: <6BEB6C94-94F8-416D-840F-E010FBD97F6B@gmail.com> <049F714F-F855-414B-936E-B66EEBB42537@cisco.com> <623637051A3DC34E80FC9BA35B4629951CF9BBBB@xmb-rcd-x05.cisco.com> <CFF23B22.E1E3B%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> <8D250AA2-EDC6-4E2E-BD7A-9097556AD971@gmail.com> <CFF28C2D.E1FC1%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/qPYYOs7Fb8QJeuoiQkSWCoN1Oes
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:14:02 -0000

I support progressing them as well. 




> On Jul 21, 2014, at 9:22 AM, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> 
> I would support progressing them as well.
> 
>> On 21/07/14 07:35, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> thanks all,
>> 
>> while more comments might have been nice I think we've got enough
>> consensus to pass this to IESG so I'll get onto that.
>> 
>> we now come on to the tricky question of TRILL EVPN and SPBM EVPN, and
>> whether there's still interest in progressing those.  Perhaps something
>> to discuss today?
>> 
>> Giles
>> 
>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 08:36, Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
>> <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Same for me support as co-author. The document is stable for a while.
>>> 
>>>> On 21/07/14 01:07, "Dennis Cai (dcai)" <dcai@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Support publication!
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Samer Salam
>>>> (ssalam)
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 8:27 PM
>>>> To: Giles Heron
>>>> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Re: WG LC for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07
>>>> 
>>>> This draft has undergone multiple discussions, and workgroup review
>>>> comments were incorporated.  Support publication, as coauthor.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Samer
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 4:52 AM, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> This email initiates an IETF L2VPN WG Last Call for:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07
>>>>> 
>>>>> please comment to the list as to the suitability of this draft for
>>>>> publication as a Standards Track RFC from the L2VPN WG.
>>>>> 
>>>>> this last call will close on Monday 21st July 2014.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nabil & Giles
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email