Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt

Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 February 2014 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AF91A02DC for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:40:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qNXoEq5mrtm2 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:40:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290381A018A for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:40:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y13so2716020pdi.33 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:40:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=exlaXR1tDHvaU10rRo/UDW3aZL2VZz3ZZQvGjDsBJx8=; b=FIstq8NI+KhrFEiQq4ie8bxvpRa3wRBCTCdE2tXacISJdljyDs1AHoStf6QZynDpP9 K3v4iF9OIELHKOcku+bh/f6+zpNgpMEUHiMQthK8HbZJoF11ebcW27R88EHgm/lXv5nn 5b7i2ohdmmDgEnmal8Aku2GDfqbzUGPdk6FaZQf8qK23nhQHThv5uxgvsokc8FtDcaBT hE+zuSTt8x4JFQxNoGxPEHh1Rs2GWEqaggj5icLapI3/jp/SlXcUkMG6HDIVDzUNXhFr eITu+KP5TDk1RARogW/V1v/c7A6skyZCgkxoj0+bfueIBcS3CJ+1VoV7jBBsui3mVKgY elPw==
X-Received: by 10.68.237.228 with SMTP id vf4mr14513840pbc.131.1393522828615; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-107-3-154-60.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [107.3.154.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dk1sm15486789pbc.46.2014.02.27.09.40.26 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:40:27 -0800 (PST)
References: <CAPCgso32vYqPEq4upa1FG78quZwBOJpzsCSCYTX2R7XgHzLiNA@mail.gmail.com> <B23247FA-7CED-4F78-8858-076CA83F613C@broadcom.com> <9F1DDAAE-BF29-48A8-BFDD-960F8F5A65F3@lucidvision.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <9F1DDAAE-BF29-48A8-BFDD-960F8F5A65F3@lucidvision.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-85DA9317-0B19-4DAB-B6CB-AB6F3D57C38D"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1647130B-9123-4019-B6EA-A5F8DACB033F@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a)
From: Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for comments: draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:40:26 -0800
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/sKR5U5jA_juTbewVGEMZ9kluaj0
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>, Pradeep Jain <pradeep@nuagenetworks.net>, Nagendra Kumar Nainar <naikumar@cisco.com>, Vinay Bannai <vbannai@paypal.com>, Ravi Shekhar <rshekhar@juniper.net>, Tissa Senevirathne <tsenevir@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:40:33 -0000

We have published a draft a while ago, <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kumar-nvo3-overlay-ping/>, which is on the lines of MPLS lsp ping. Primarily it is IP/udp ping  targeted for overlay networks. For NVo3 FM, there is a draft  <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-oam-fm/>, which will be presented in the NVo3 WG session.

Cheers
Sam
Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:03 AM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 	I had precisely the same question.  Most DCs simply use IP/Enet which allow for the use of the "regular suspects" in the tools department. 
> 
> 	The other concern I have with specifying new tools on top of the underlay is that the underlay probably is running some diag tools for failure detection/trouble-shooting too (like Ethernet OAM/BFD/etc...), so once again we have the issue to consider of OAM traffic consuming significant amounts of actual BW.  Given how modern applications are built and run, its unlikely we need anything heavy weight in the overlay and can instead allow for application resiliency to handle failure detection, and instead have the "normal" tools available for trouble-shooting on an as-needed basis.
> 
> 	--Tom
> 
> 
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Why don't you use existing IP based OAM messages such as BFD, OWAMP, TWAMP, etc.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Shahram
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 7:46 AM, "Kanwar Singh" <kanwar@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> We have submitted the below draft that proposes Generic OAM and Datapath Failure Detection Mechanism(s) for Overlay Networks.
>>> 
>>> We would like to solicit inputs from the members of L2VPN WG.
>>> 
>>> Please review the same and update us with your inputs/feedback.
>>> 
>>> Warm Regards
>>> - Kanwar
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Kanwar Singh and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Name:           draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam
>>> 
>>> Revision:       01
>>> Title:          Generic Overlay OAM and Datapath Failure Detection
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Document date:  2014-02-12
>>> 
>>> Group:          Individual Submission
>>> 
>>> Pages:          44
>>> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01.txt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Htmlized:      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Diff:              http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-jain-nvo3-overlay-oam-01
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    This proposal describes a mechanism that can be used to detect Data
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    Path Failures of various overlay technologies as VXLAN, NVGRE,
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP and verifying/sanity of their Control and Data
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    Plane for given Overlay Segment.  This document defines the following
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    for each of the above Overlay Technologies:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    o  Encapsulation of OAM Packet, such that it has same Outer and
>>> 
>>> 
>>>       Overlay Header as any End-System's data going over the same
>>> 
>>> 
>>>       Overlay Segment.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    o  The mechanism to trace the Underlay that is exercised by any
>>> 
>>> 
>>>       Overlay Segment.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    o  Procedure to verify presence of any given Tenant VM or End-System
>>> 
>>> 
>>>       within a given Overlay Segment at Overlay End-Point.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    Even though the present proposal addresses Overlay OAM for VXLAN,
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    NVGRE, MPLSoGRE and MPLSoUDP, but the procedures described are
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    generic enough to accommodate OAM for any other Overlay Technology.
>